跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1151新增论文
+896其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 18:20 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 18:56 — 2026-11-06 18:56(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 18:20最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 18:19(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04591

SparseGraph-I2P: Consistency-Guided Hypothesis Selection for Efficient Image-to-Point-Cloud Registration

Ziyang Yu, Xiang Li, Qiong Chang, Jun Miyazaki

Coarse-to-fine image-to-point-cloud (I2P) registration risks discarding correct but ambiguous patch pairs, while retaining more candidates repeats fine matching over overlapping patches. SparseGraph-I2P aims to improve registration recall by increasing the inlier ratio at the pose solver, using sensor or monocular depth. A Coarse Hypothesis Graph combines appearance with depth-derived first- and second-order compatibility to select a fixed budget of patch pairs. Sparse Fine Matching decodes each queried pixel once and skips pixel--point comparisons covered by an ancestor patch paired with the same point-cloud region. With sensor depth, depth-aware filtering ranks correspondences by SC2 spectral support for a single EPnP solve. With monocular depth, depth or inverse depth is calibrated from correspondence geometry before filtering. SparseGraph-I2P achieves the highest registration recall and lowest latency among the compared methods on RGB-D Scenes V2 and 7-Scenes with sensor depth. With predicted depth, it retains the highest recall on RGB-D Scenes V2 at an additional calibration cost. Code will be released.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV · cs.MM
arXiv ↗PDF ↗