跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 15:23 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 16:21 — 2026-11-10 16:21(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 15:23最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 15:22(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.41536

DAPS: Dependency-Aware Premise Selection for LLM Theorem Proving

Zixuan Chen, Wenyuan Jiang, Junling Wang, Mrinmaya Sachan, Yinya Huang

原文摘要

LLM-based theorem proving in Lean 4 has advanced rapidly, but provers are difficult to leverage newly contributed lemmas, because retrieval skews toward popular foundational lemmas, leaving the right premises buried among hundreds of thousands of candidates. Existing neural selectors rank candidates by semantic similarity, with three intrinsic limitations: frequency-skewed retrieval, isolated pairwise ranking, and degradation on out-of-distribution queries such as competition problems and informal language. Given that mathematics is structured by dependencies rather than similarities, we restore this signal to both the training data and the model. We curate two underused dependency resources. We conduct the first systematic mining of 53 Lean Blueprint projects, a previously untapped corpus of 3,805 manually curated informal+formal nodes that capture rare, research-level premises absent from Mathlib4. We further pair it with the extraction of comprehensive, typed, multi-level Mathlib4 dependencies. We then introduce DAPS, a dependency-aware premise selector with a structural neighborhood encoder, a group-level contrastive objective, and a Mathlib-then-Blueprint adaptation procedure. DAPS reaches 78.74 Recall@16 on Mathlib4-Heldout (+11.41 over the strong selector LeanHammer) and widens the margin to 7xrecall on competition-style queries. Downstream, its selected premises raise Goedel-Prover-V2-8B Pass@4 on miniF2F-test from 49.90 to 54.03 and improve all four general-purpose LLMs on the informal IMO-ProofBench (up to +11.4% relative). Project page: https://daps-eth.github.io/.

cs.LO · cs.CL · cs.LG

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.2209ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Tackling the Root of Misinformation by Teaching Laypeople about Logical Fallacies via Socratic Questioning and Critical Argumentation

Minjing Shi, Junling Wang ETHZ - ETH Zurich, Jingwei Ni ETHZ - ETH Zurich, Sankalan Pal Chowdhury, Mrinmaya Sachan

原文摘要

Identifying logical fallacies (LFs) in everyday discourse is challenging for many people. This challenge is amplified in the era of Large Language Models (LLMs), where malicious agents can deploy fallacious arguments to disseminate misinformation at scale. In this work, we explore the potential of LLMs as part of the solution. We introduce LFTutor, an intelligent tutoring system which uses LLMs to tutor humans and help them learn about logical fallacies. LFTutor integrates intent-driven Socratic questioning and critical argumentation principles to actively engage learners to reflect on their reasoning. Through both automatic and human evaluations, we demonstrate that LFTutor significantly outperforms baseline LLMs lacking such pedagogical strategies. This work highlights the promise of combining LLMs with pedagogical scaffolding to foster critical thinking and argument literacy in the age of AI.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表