跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+367新增论文
+288其中 AI 相关
+33已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 10:18 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 10:17各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 11:08 — 2026-11-09 11:08(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 10:18最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 10:17库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 12:44

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,467 已收录论文14,949 AI 相关4,222 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 10:16(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.04619

Online Graph Exploration under T-Interval Connectivity

Yuichi Sudo, Naoki Kitamura, Masahiro Shibata, Junya Nakamura, Sébastien Tixeuil, Toshimitsu Masuzawa, Koichi Wada

原文摘要

We study deterministic exploration by a single agent in $T$-interval-connected graphs, a standard model of dynamic networks in which, for every time window of length $T$, the intersection of the graphs within the window is connected. The agent does not know the window size $T$, nor the number of nodes $n$ or edges $m$, and must visit all nodes of the graph. We consider two visibility models: in $KT_0$, the agent observes only its current node's identifier and port information; in $KT_1$, it additionally observes the identifiers of its currently available neighbors. We investigate two fundamental questions: the minimum window size that guarantees exploration, and the optimal exploration time under sufficiently large window size. For both models, we show that a window size $T = Ω(m)$ is necessary, and we present deterministic algorithms whose required window size is $O(ξ(n,m)\cdot m + n \log^2 n)$, where $ξ(n,m) = \frac{\ln n}{1 + \ln m - \ln n}$. This window-size bound is tight for a wide range of $m$, in particular when $m = n^{1+Θ(1)}$. Separately, for exploration time, we prove lower bounds of $Ω((m - n + 1)n)$ in the $KT_0$ model and $Ω(m)$ in the $KT_1$ model, even when the dynamic graph is $\infty$-interval-connected (i.e., even when all snapshots share a common spanning tree), and our algorithms match these time bounds up to a polylogarithmic factor. These bounds are also tight when parameterized solely by $n$: $Θ(n^3)$ for $KT_0$ and $Θ(n^2)$ for $KT_1$.

cs.DC