As large language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied for emotional companionship, evaluating their behavior and capabilities in intimate relationships has become a pressing issue. However, existing assessments primarily characterize general personality traits, providing limited insight into model behavior within intimate and emotionally sensitive contexts. Therefore, we introduce adult attachment theory into LLM evaluation and use the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised (ECR-R) scale to characterize attachment anxiety and avoidance. To evaluate emotional companionship capabilities of LLMs in realistic interaction scenarios, we present an emotional companionship benchmark, ECBench, spanning four scenarios including emotional support, collaborative tasks, conflict resolution, and social guidance, across friendship and romantic relationships. ECBench is utilized to assess model behavior using 11 dialogue-quality metrics and three evaluation methods. We evaluate the attachment tendencies of 32 LLMs and select representative models to investigate how these tendencies manifest in contextualized multi-turn interactions and whether they can be shaped through prompting. Our study provides a theoretical lens from psychology, along with practical tools to understand and select LLMs for emotional companionship.
Long-horizon decision-making under sustained competition requires large language models (LLMs) to balance immediate investment with future resource needs. However, local success in multi-step interactions can not adequately capture cumulative decision effects or demonstrate long-term goal achievement under resource constraints and sustained competition. To address this gap, we introduce GM Bench, a benchmark for managing professional sports teams across seasons under resource constraints and competition among teams. We build the environment simulators for four sports and add financial constraints, player demands, and market mechanisms to establish a unified task across sports. Diverse rosters of comparable strength are constructed from real-world player data, and each LLM is evaluated as a team general manager to assess its long-term management capabilities. We evaluate competitive performance, cash reserves, and cross-season improvement across four sports. Over five NBA seasons, Claude Opus 5.5 ranks first among 29 LLMs, while GPT-6 Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol combine strong performance with larger cash reserves.
Jinwu Hu, Langyu Bian, Jian Sun, Dongjin Yang, Chao Shuai, Yufeng Wang, Kai Zhou, Bin Xiao 等 11 位作者
Open-set test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to adapt source-trained models to unlabeled test streams where covariate-shifted in-distribution (csID) samples and covariate-shifted out-of-distribution (csOOD) samples may coexist. Existing TTA methods are typically designed under a closed-set assumption and therefore lack explicit mechanisms for reliably distinguishing csID from csOOD samples. Consequently, csOOD samples may be mistakenly included in confidence-enhancing adaptation, producing harmful gradients that degrade known-class performance. To address this, we propose Uncertainty-Aware Prototype Learning for Open-Set Test-Time Adaptation (UAPA), a plug-and-play method for reliable open-set adaptation. Specifically, we first introduce Uncertainty-Driven ID/OOD Separation, which combines a classifier-prototype score with a mini-batch-normalized evidence-derived uncertainty score to distinguish csID from csOOD samples. We then propose a Dynamic Prototype Refinement strategy that periodically refines class-specific target prototypes using buffered csID features to progressively follow the estimated class directions. Lastly, we introduce Contrastive Prototype Entropy Adaptation, which applies entropy minimization to csID samples and entropy maximization to csOOD samples, while prototype-level contrastive learning aligns csID features with their corresponding target prototypes and reduces the maximum similarity between csOOD features and known-class prototypes. Empirically, UAPA outperforms the strongest baselines on the CIFAR benchmarks and Tiny-ImageNet-C, improving average OSCR by 2.08 and 1.28 percentage points, respectively.
A binary success indicator is a natural representation for discriminative tasks such as image classification under adversarial perturbations, where each input is mapped to a single prediction. However, generative tasks are fundamentally different: an LLM jailbreak prompt induces a distribution over open-ended trajectories, while a sampled response reveals only one path. Yet LLM jailbreak evaluation typically retains the binary response indicator underlying attack success rate, obscuring the surrounding structure of possible generations. We introduce a continuous, context-conditioned risk landscape over first-token branches, estimated by fixing candidate openings and repeatedly sampling their continuations. This continuous risk-landscape perspective reveals two complementary properties: current decoder exposure and safe rerouting capacity, which have been obscured by binary-indicator-based ASR. The resulting representation also provides a common basis for comparing clean prompts, attacked variants, and attack strength against a known adaptive defense. Across multiple target models and jailbreak attacks, we uncover risky branches beneath apparently safe outputs, identify qualitatively different ways attacks reshape the model's opening distribution, and show that attacks strongest before a defense do not necessarily remain the strongest after the adaptive defense reacts. These findings recast jailbreaks as deformations of the surrounding continuation-risk landscape, establishing a more informative foundation for understanding jailbreak behavior and developing safer language models.
Xinxun Zhang, Yuxiang Wang, Xiaokai Zhou, Jiayue Li, Yi Li, Yue Liu, Jun Zhang, Xiaoling Zhou 等 11 位作者
Click-through rate (CTR) prediction relies on historical behaviors and contextual features to estimate clicks on a target item. Existing Transformer-based CTR models often adopt index-based or temporal positional encodings and token-level causal interaction. However, we observe that most existing positional encodings do not outperform NoPE, while relaxing causal constraints within target-relative temporal groups also yields gains. These observations motivate a fundamental question: what positional encoding and interaction granularity does CTR prediction actually require? To address this question, we propose \textbf{TRIP}, which combines target-aware rank--time positional encoding with temporal-group interaction modeling. Specifically, Factorized Rank Encoding represents each behavior's ordinal position within the historical sequence through a low-rank factorization, while Target-Relative Time Encoding characterizes its temporal distance to the target on a coarse-to-fine scale. This joint design grounds each behavior's positional representation in its sequence context and temporal relation to the current target. Furthermore, Temporal Group-Causal Interaction enriches intra-group representations through bidirectional interaction and masked reconstruction while preserving inter-group causal order. Finally, behavior representations are condensed into compact group summaries for efficient group-level modeling in subsequent layers. Experiments on four public benchmarks show that TRIP improves AUC by up to 4.45\% relative to the strongest baseline.
A fundamental challenge for explainable and accountable language models is revealing how external information influences their answers. This paper examines whether models are self-attributive: that is, whether they indicate when -- and only when -- their responses to questions are influenced by information provided alongside the question. Furthermore, we explore how self-attribution can be improved through counterfactual training, which explicitly teaches models to distinguish between answers that do and do not depend on supplied information. We found that most of the eleven frontier models rarely attribute influential information in their answers, and the rest attribute non-influential information. Training acknowledgment into reasoning does not fix this: the acknowledgment does not reach the final answer. We introduce CREDIT, which directly supervises final-answer self-attribution with counterfactual labels, without the need for human annotation. CREDIT substantially improves attribution in four open models, including two distilled reasoning models, and outperforms reasoning-level fine-tuning and prompting baselines. Among answers that agree with a user's suggestion, CREDIT distinguishes those changed by the suggestion from those the model would have given anyway. Gains transfer partly to unseen information types and prompts containing sources that support conflicting answers.