YiJie Huang, Xiaocui Yang Northeastern University, Shi Feng Northeastern University, China, Wen Zhang Northeastern University, Kaisong Song, Yifei Zhang, Daling Wang
Efficiently aligning visual features with Large Language Models (LLMs) remains a critical bottleneck in Multimodal LLMs. Existing query-based alignment modules (e.g., Q-Former) rely on randomly initialized queries, resulting in an inefficient cold start exploration process. Furthermore, they enforce uniform cross-attention across all layers, leading to computational redundancy. Our empirical analysis reveals that query tokens initialized with language priors can rapidly capture global semantics, leading to early representation convergence after only a few layers. In this paper, we propose Cat-MoD, a Caption token Guided Asymmetric Mixture-of-Depths framework. It incorporates a Hybrid Query Construction module where Guide Tokens initialized from coarse-grained linguistic priors rapidly anchor global semantic context, and randomly initialized Explorer Tokens remain active to capture fine-grained visual details. Exploiting this early convergence, we introduce an Asymmetric Mixture-of-Depths mechanism, where a similarity-aware router dynamically prunes redundant tokens from expensive cross-attention layers while preserving their context in self-attention. Experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that Cat-MoD matches or surpasses baseline performance, while substantially reducing alignment FLOPs by approximately 37% during both training and inference, offering a highly efficient solution for multimodal alignment. Code: https://github.com/JasonOrange0726/Cat-MoD.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.CV
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Ensuring fairness in social survey simulation is critical, as biased outputs can misrepresent underrepresented groups. This issue is growing as large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used for this task. However, standard fine-tuning based on Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) often under-optimizes minority groups, causing substantial subgroup disparities. Distributionally robust Optimization (DRO) methods reduce worst-case errors, but their strict worst-case selection can lead to noisy and unstable optimization under demographic sparsity. These issues create intertwined challenges for fairness, convergence and stability. We propose SAFO, a dynamic utility–fairness optimization framework for LLM-based survey simulation that explicitly targets both fairness and training stability. SAFO combines (i) an Optimizer that preserves mean-loss utility, (ii) an Adversary that performs temperature-controlled, EMA-smoothed and loss-driven group reweighting, and (iii) a Nash-inspired Regulator that adaptively adjusts the utility–fairness trade-off by tracking weak-group gains and collateral utility damages. Experiments on three large-scale survey datasets from China, the U.S., and Europe show that SAFO consistently improves minority performance and social-welfare metrics. It reduces worst-group gaps by up to 12.7%, maintains overall accuracy with a mean change of less than 0.3% and lowers variance across random seeds. Our code is available at https://github.com/PiLab-ZJU/SAFO.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Weikang Yuan, Kaisong Song, Zhuoren Jiang Zhejiang University, Junjie Cao, Yujie Zhang, Jun Lin, Kun Kuang Zhejiang University, Ji Zhang Alibaba Group 等 9 位作者
Legal consultation is essential for safeguarding individual rights and ensuring access to justice, yet remains costly and inaccessible to many individuals due to the shortage of professionals. While recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a promising path toward scalable, low-cost legal assistance, current systems fall short in handling the interactive and knowledge-intensive nature of real-world consultations. To address these challenges, we introduce LeCoDe, a multi-turn benchmark dataset constructed from publicly available real-world legal consultation content and carefully processed into a de-identified, structured research resource for evaluating and advancing research on LLMs in legal consultation settings. LeCoDe contains 3,696 multi-turn consultation cases with 110,008 dialogue turns. The dataset is further enriched through expert annotation, including key facts, fact importance, and advice summaries. Furthermore, we propose a comprehensive evaluation framework that assesses LLMs’ consultation capabilities in terms of (1) clarification capability and (2) professional advice quality. This unified framework incorporates 12 metrics across two dimensions. Through extensive experiments on various general and domain-specific LLMs, our results reveal significant challenges in this task, with even state-of-the-art models like GPT-4 achieving only 35.9% recall for clarification and 59.1% overall score for advice quality, highlighting the complexity of professional consultation scenarios. Based on these findings, we further explore several strategies to enhance LLMs’ legal consultation abilities. Our benchmark contributes to advancing research in legal domain dialogue systems, particularly in simulating more real-world user-expert interactions. The resource is available at https://github.com/PiLab-ZJU/LeCoDe.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
YongKang Liu Northeast University, Jiayang Yu Peking University, Mingyang Wang LMU Munich, Yiqun Zhang Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and Northeastern University, Ercong Nie Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shi Feng Northeastern University, China, Daling Wang, Kaisong Song 等 9 位作者
Argumentation generation has attracted substantial research interest due to its central role in human reasoning and decision-making. However, most existing argumentative corpora focus on non-interactive, single-turn settings, either generating arguments from a given topic or refuting an existing argument. In practice, however, argumentation is often realized as multi-turn dialogue, where speakers defend their stances and employ diverse argumentative strategies to strengthen persuasiveness. To support deeper modeling of argumentation dialogue, we present the first large-scale Strategic Argumentative Dialogue dataset, SAD, consisting of 392,822 examples. Grounded in argumentation theories, we annotate each utterance with five strategy types, allowing multiple strategies per utterance. Unlike prior datasets, SAD requires models to generate contextually appropriate arguments conditioned on the dialogue history, a specified stance on the topic, and targeted argumentation strategies. We further benchmark a range of pretrained generative models on SAD and present in-depth analysis of strategy usage patterns in argumentation.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表