跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1115新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+86已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 12:10 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 12:10各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 12:47 — 2026-11-06 12:47(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 12:10最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 12:10库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,064 已收录论文14,633 AI 相关4,019 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 12:09(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05954

Robots in the City: Persona-Based Perceptions of Urban Robots

Keonhee Jang, Kanghoon Lee, Seokwoo Yun, Namwoo Kim, Yoonjin Yoon

Pedestrians increasingly encounter robots in urban public spaces without interacting with them, but how robots change the perceived safety of a street remains unclear. We examine how robot presence and type affect perceived safety across urban contexts. We generate 18 images of Seoul streets that vary in time of day, road class, and robot condition (no robot, a delivery robot, or a humanoid). Two multimodal large language models (MLLMs), Qwen3.8-27B and Gemma4-26B, each conditioned on 500 synthetic personas, choose the safer image in each pair, and 25 human respondents complete the same task. Both models prefer streets without robots and favor the delivery robot over the humanoid. Robots are chosen more often at night and less often by older personas, whereas road class has smaller effects. In the model rationales, the delivery robot appears as a physical obstacle, whereas the humanoid appears as either a threat or a source of protection. Like humans, both models chose robots more often at night, but chose the humanoid over the delivery robot far less often, and Gemma showed a night effect for the humanoid about three times that of humans. These results show that the effect of a robot on perceived safety depends on when it appears, and that persona-conditioned MLLMs capture only part of human judgments.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.HC · cs.CL · cs.RO
arXiv ↗PDF ↗