Mingming Ding, Ruilin Chen, Yuzhen Huang, Hang Qi, Menglu Yu, San Tan, Damian Reeves, Boris Sarana 等 32 位作者
Lifecycle overhead silently consumes accelerator capacity across large-scale recommendation training fleets. Our largest recommendation workloads process tens of billions train- ing examples per day on thousands of GPUs. Before this work, only 50-60% of their end-to-end wall time advanced training on new data. We present a fleet-scale study of this lifecycle overhead and a set of optimizations spanning the full training stack. We use Effective Training Time (ETT%) as an operational framework to instrument lost time, localize it to independently owned infrastructure components, and expose work repeated across job restarts. This analysis guides optimizations like communication elimination and pipeline overlap during trainer initialization; dynamic-shape handling, autotuning pruning, and reusable Py- Torch 2 compilation caches; asynchronous checkpointing; stan- dalone model publishing; and reductions in recovery cost. We evaluate the optimizations on representative models and measure their impacts in our training fleet. ETT% improves on every benchmark, by 15.5% on average, and reaches 85% on our largest workload. Fleet-wide ETT% rose from about 80% to above 90% after deployment.
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems often perform less accurately for speakers of regional dialects, but less is known about how users respond to these limitations and how regional voices produced by voice assistants (VAs) are evaluated through a sociolinguistic lens. This study investigates these issues among speakers of Newcastle English (Geordies), examining both linguistic accommodation to voice technologies and perceptions of regional versus mainstream-accented VA voices. Participants interacted with a simulated VA that spoke either Newcastle English or Standard Southern British English (SSBE). They subsequently completed semi-structured interviews about their experiences with the experimental VA and voice technologies, language use, accent attitudes, and place orientation. The findings reveal a two-way process of sociolinguistic bias. The Geordie VA was associated with familiarity, warmth, personality, and local belonging, but also with concerns about professionalism and authority, whereas the SSBE voice was perceived as more neutral, clear, and credible. Participants also reported adapting their speech when voice technologies failed to recognise them, most commonly by shifting to a more mainstream accent, enunciating more clearly, and speaking more slowly. These strategies are similar to accommodation in human-human interaction and reflect users' perceptions of what technologies can recognise, also known as perceived intelligibility pressures. Overall, the findings demonstrate that voice technologies can reproduce existing accent biases both by encouraging users to suppress regional features and by activating established social stereotypes through synthetic voices. The study positions sociolinguistics as a bridge between understanding human-AI interaction and designing inclusive technologies around users' own linguistic priorities.