Unconditional Lower Bounds for the Fredman--Khachiyan Algorithms for Monotone Boolean Duality Testing
Khaled Elbassioni
We prove unconditional lower bounds on the number of recursive calls made by the two algorithms of Fredman and Khachiyan (1996) for monotone Boolean duality testing, as a function of the explicit input size $N$. For Algorithm A we show a lower bound of $N^{Ω(\log N)}$ on the dual pairs $(\HH_k,\LL_k)$ obtained from the read-once family of Gurvich and Khachiyan. The proof lower-bounds the number of leaves of every binary decision tree computing the function by the modulus of its multilinear polynomial evaluated at a complex point of the unit circle. It therefore applies to every choice of branching variables and, more generally, to the class of two-child variable-restriction procedures whose terminal calls have polynomially bounded decision-tree complexity. On this family the number of calls is exactly $N^{Θ(\log N)}$. For Algorithm B, a symmetric specialization of the polynomial padding construction of Kobayashi, Kurita, and Wasa, with full polynomial blocks, yields at least $q^{(t-1)k-t(t-1)/2}$ calls, where $k=4t^2$ and $q=Θ(t^2)$; as a function of $N$ this is $N^{Ω(\sqrt{\log N/\log\log N})}$ along an infinite family. In an appendix we show that applying the padding construction directly to Algorithm A gives $Ω(2^n)$ calls on a dual pair obtained from an unsatisfiable $n$-variable formula, which is only $N^{Ω(\sqrt{\log N/\log\log N})}$ in terms of the input size. No complexity-theoretic assumption is used. The proofs allow every branching-variable choice permitted by the respective algorithm. They concern the original recursive procedures, counting every invocation separately, without sharing calls or adding positive stopping tests.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要