跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 04:00 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 04:22 — 2026-11-13 04:22(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 04:00最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 03:58(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10313

Multi-objective drift-aware MLOps agent for model retraining

Kumuda Valli, Anli Ji

原文摘要

Deployed ML models face non-stationary data and delayed labels, yet most retraining strategies rely on fixed schedules or brittle drift thresholds that ignore operational cost. In this setting, retraining is a sequential decision problem rather than a one-time threshold choice. We present DARE (Drift-Aware Retraining Engine), an offline, event-driven retraining framework that separates ingestion, monitoring, policy decisions, training, and logging through explicit schemas and deterministic replay. We compare DARE against practical heuristic retraining baselines, including fixed-interval, threshold-persistence, and action-rate-matched fixed scheduling policies. On Airline, the locked LinUCB policy achieves a higher mean F1 while substantially reducing intervention frequency relative to heuristic and action-rate-matched baselines. Additional runtime-calibrated evaluation shows that these gains persist when measured using the cumulative update wall-clock time. These results suggest that conservative sequential retraining policies can improve performance while reducing unnecessary operational overhead under delayed feedback.

cs.LG