跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1087新增论文
+804其中 AI 相关
+107已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-14 11:06 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-13 13:55 — 2026-11-14 13:55(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-14 11:06最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-14 11:04(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.14931

Hint-Informed Self-Distillation for Reasoning Segmentation

Kunze Jiang, Yuchen Wang, Kang Li, Qixing Zhang

原文摘要

Reasoning segmentation requires identifying the target referred to by a query among visually similar objects, yet trajectory-level rewards cannot directly indicate which tokens provide relevant visual evidence. We propose Hint-Informed Self-Distillation (HISD), which uses target-disambiguation evidence for token-level credit assignment. An external model generates Segment Hints offline from training images, queries, and ground-truth target annotations, organizing target identity, discriminative attributes, confusable objects, and anchoring paths. A hint-conditioned exponential moving average teacher scores the student's own trajectories, and HISD computes the teacher-to-student evidence ratio over a token support set to adjust only the magnitudes of positive group-relative advantages, leaving nonpositive advantages unchanged. This design encourages concise reasoning while retaining the information needed for target disambiguation, and the student requires neither hints nor a teacher at inference. Under a unified training protocol, HISD improves ReasonSeg test gIoU and cIoU over our reproduction of DPAD by 3.00 and 3.55 percentage points, respectively. Across the five evaluated splits of ReasonSeg and the RefCOCO family, HISD achieves higher segmentation metrics than this baseline and reduces the average token count of valid reasoning spans by 80.17 to 91.83 percent.

cs.CV · cs.AI