Human evaluation of AI-generated videos has so far relied on explicit human feedback, such as judgments or ratings. While these signals capture the conclusions viewers reach, they fail to offer insights into the perception that leads to them. This paper investigates eye tracking as a complementary human evaluation signal for AI-generated videos. We conducted two Visual Turing Test (VTT) experiments with a total of 90 participants on videos generated by latest generative models, in which participants watched each video twice and then gave their feedback. Across the experiments, we collected 4,286 valid eye-tracking trials on 438 videos. Our analysis indicates that gaze patterns offer informative evaluation signals that align with explicit human feedback. Building on the findings, we propose the first computational method GazeEval to predict the perceived visual realism of AI-generated videos from eye-tracking data. It achieves 71.3% accuracy in prediction, providing evidence that eye tracking data carries informative signals about how people evaluate a video. We release the study data to support further research on eye tracking for evaluating AI-generated video.
Chia-Hsuan Chang, Brian Ondov, Jiang Lv, Lan Jiang, Yunmai Wang, Haerin Song, Xueqing Peng, Qiaozhu Mei 等 10 位作者
AI co-scientists have expanded the use of large language models for generating scientific hypotheses and guiding experimental investigation. Here we investigate whether temporal patterns in the semantic representations of complete biomedical conclusions can guide hypothesis generation. We introduce ForeSCITE, a framework that identifies thematic clusters of published conclusions, estimates a direction separating earlier from more recent findings within each cluster, and projects existing conclusion embeddings along these directions. An embedding language model trained to reconstruct conclusions decodes the projected coordinates into natural-language hypotheses. Across 407 clusters derived from approximately three million pre-cutoff conclusions, we identify temporal structure and illustrate its retention after decoding. In retrospective, time-sliced evaluations, ForeSCITE increases semantic coverage beyond the historical corpus, biomedical entity-pair novelty and post-cutoff pair re-observation relative to five prompt-based and retrieval-augmented baselines. Expert review of prioritized CAR-T hypotheses identified 37 candidates as both novel and biologically plausible, and expert justifications for five selected hypotheses illustrate their biological rationale and subsequent literature support where available. These findings support temporal guidance in semantic space as a scalable mechanism for proposing biomedical hypotheses for subsequent scientific evaluation.