What Simple Readouts Miss in Continuous Language Diffusion
Zhicheng Du, Lan Ma
原文摘要
How much of a learned decoder can a simple readout preserve? On generated ELF and AURORA states, token-wise affine maps recover $97.17\%$ and $95.74\%$ of native lexical decisions. Contextual computation has already produced these states; only the terminal readout is simplified. The remaining disagreements matter beyond their count: equal-count rare-first and low-native-margin-first repairs have opposing pooled evaluator effects in both interfaces. On conditional summarization, rare-first improves reference similarity, while source consistency remains unresolved. Score accounting locates part of the benefit on unchanged text despite increased unigram cost, without identifying rarity as a cause. Repeatable repair effects do not ensure prediction transfer: a frozen predictor improves on two ELF checkpoints but fails on a distilled student. A separate task-fitted selector improves BERTScore over random selection by $0.261$ points on 256 fresh articles at a $50\%$ native-call budget; all-native decoding remains higher-scoring and acceleration is unestablished. Compressed and directional interface tests further distinguish fitting-state coverage, native decisions, and soft inputs. Together, the results motivate testing a simplification at three levels: preserved decisions, output consequences, and computational savings. Native decisions are fidelity targets, not semantic truth.
cs.CL · cs.LG