跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科，以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词，把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1030新增论文
+790其中 AI 相关
+128已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描：2026-11-12 01:48 · 全站最近入库：2026-11-11 22:47各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 02:07 — 2026-11-12 02:07（北京时间） · 点击数字查看对应简报；AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查：2026-11-12 01:48最近发现新增版本：2026-11-11 22:47库内论文最新更新时间：2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常；新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,673 已收录论文18,321 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

研究日报 / 周报 →按信源浏览 →

时间范围跟随排序：版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常，查看状态 →

找到 7 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 01:46（北京时间）
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2611.03412

DeliverBench: Benchmarking AI Agents on Delivering Realistic Multi-Stage Professional Projects

Yumou Liu, Mingju Chen, Zhoufutu Wen, Qianyu Yang, Zijie Wang, Sihan Chen, Yeqian Liu, Chenghao Yang 等 24 位作者

原文摘要

LLM agents are judged by what they deliver, and in professional work what gets delivered is a project, not a task. A project pays off only if the whole package holds together, and one weak part can limit the value of the rest. Yet existing benchmarks mostly test agents on one task at a time, leaving a gap between the capability we measure and the outcome that makes agents useful. To address this gap, we introduce DeliverBench, which tests whether agents can carry a project from brief to final delivery. Reconstructed from real materials with 13 domain experts, its 11 projects span settings such as financial due diligence, legal contract drafting, and drug safety reporting. They comprise 150 subtasks, with 2-15 subsequent releases of new materials and client feedback per project. Later subtasks build on the agent's own earlier deliverables, so unresolved errors can carry into downstream work. Expert rubrics assess each subtask submission and the final delivery package. Across seven model-harness systems, the best scores 65.0/100 on final delivery and passes 50.0% of subtasks at a 90-point threshold. Together, these results suggest that task-level capability does not simply compose into delivery; delivery also depends on keeping the work coherent as it evolves.

cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2606.08810

What Simple Readouts Miss in Continuous Language Diffusion

Zhicheng Du, Lan Ma

原文摘要

How much of a learned decoder can a simple readout preserve? On generated ELF and AURORA states, token-wise affine maps recover $97.17\%$ and $95.74\%$ of native lexical decisions. Contextual computation has already produced these states; only the terminal readout is simplified. The remaining disagreements matter beyond their count: equal-count rare-first and low-native-margin-first repairs have opposing pooled evaluator effects in both interfaces. On conditional summarization, rare-first improves reference similarity, while source consistency remains unresolved. Score accounting locates part of the benefit on unchanged text despite increased unigram cost, without identifying rarity as a cause. Repeatable repair effects do not ensure prediction transfer: a frozen predictor improves on two ELF checkpoints but fails on a distilled student. A separate task-fitted selector improves BERTScore over random selection by $0.261$ points on 256 fresh articles at a $50\%$ native-call budget; all-native decoding remains higher-scoring and acceleration is unestablished. Compressed and directional interface tests further distinguish fitting-state coverage, native decisions, and soft inputs. Together, the results motivate testing a simplification at three levels: preserved decisions, output consequences, and computational savings. Native decisions are fidelity targets, not semantic truth.

cs.CL · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11005

GradReason: LLMs as Meta-Learners that Replace Training Epochs with Training-Data-Free Weight Updates

Ali Mohammadi Ruzbahani, Abbas Yazdinejad, Hadis Karimipour

原文摘要

Standard training recipes make a fixed number of passes over the training data, even when an epoch mostly adds mini-batch noise. We study whether a large language model (LLM) that reads the weight and gradient history of a run can replace some of these epochs with updates that compute no gradient and read no training image. In GradReason, an LLM agent is called every ten epochs. In a restricted sandbox, it analyses recent weight snapshots, epoch-mean gradients, and validation metrics, then submits a Python program that computes new weights and a plan marking each of the next ten epochs as data or virtual. A virtual epoch is kept only if it passes a forward-only check on 5,000 held-out validation images. In 120 runs on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 with three architectures, Claude Opus 5.5 used 32.8% fewer data epochs than the 80-epoch recipe at 0.31 percentage points lower test accuracy (95% CI -0.72 to +0.09; 0.94 points on ResNet-18), on the recipe's own frontier of data against accuracy. Unprompted, Opus averaged recent weight snapshots in every run. This choice produced the savings: a fixed rule with the same acceptance check but extrapolations from prior work saved 5.4% of the data epochs, and the same rule with averaging added saved 25.0%. The LLM's contribution is to find a working update within a single run; once found, a fixed rule implements it equally well. An Opus run cost 0.68 USD, but at this scale the agent's latency exceeded the GPU time it saved.

cs.LG · cs.AI

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v4arXiv:2603.12222

HiAP: A Multi-Granular Stochastic Auto-Pruning Framework for Vision Transformers

Andy Li, Aiden Durrant, Milan Markovic, Georgios Leontidis

原文摘要

Vision Transformers require significant computational resources and memory bandwidth, severely limiting their deployment on resource-constrained hardware. Most structured pruning methods reduce theoretical cost effectively, yet they typically operate at a single structural granularity and depend on multi-stage pipelines with importance ranking, auxiliary solvers or post-hoc magnitude thresholding, followed by a separate fine-tuning phase to recover accuracy. We propose Hierarchical Auto-Pruning (HiAP), which casts ViT pruning as a single budget-aware learning problem and jointly allocates sparsity across four granularities in one end-to-end phase. HiAP introduces stochastic Gumbel-Sigmoid gates at macro level (attention heads and FFN blocks) and micro level (intra-head dimensions and FFN neurons), and trains them against the task loss together with an analytical MAC cost term. Two penalty weights set how much compute is removed, while the gates gradually harden into a dense, smaller sub-network at convergence. It does not require importance heuristics, ranking metrics, auxiliary solvers or secondary fine-tuning. On ImageNet, HiAP compresses DeiT-Base to 7.4G MACs at 80.88% top-1 80.40% at 7.8G without distillation and DeiT-Small to 3.1G at 79.33%, competitive with substantially more complex pipelines at matched compute. The structurally pruned network can be accelerated natively on stock kernels, and more than 90% of the theoretical MAC reduction is realized as measured throughput at batch 256 on an A100.

cs.CV · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.29927

Does The Way You Plan Matter? An Empirical Study of Planning Representations for LLM Web Agents

Alejandra Zambrano, Sara Vera Marjanovic, Imene Kerboua, Xing Han Lù, Leila Kosseim

原文摘要

Despite recent advances, LLM-based web agents still struggle with limited exploration, omission of critical steps, and sensitivity to task constraints. Prior work suggests that many of these failures stem from weaknesses in planning, yet the impact of alternative natural language plan representations remains unexplored. To address this, we introduce PlanAhead, a static planner-executor framework that evaluates the impact of plan representation on agent performance. We first automatically categorize WebArena tasks into 3 difficulty levels, enabling consistent difficulty grading without human annotation. Then we systematically evaluate 4 different plan representations on the tasks categorized as hard: sequential subgoals, narrative, pseudocode, and checklist; across different families of multimodal LLM-powered agents(OpenAI, Alibaba, and Google). To account for stochastic variability, we introduce a novel decomposition of agent Success Rate (SR) into 2 interpretable evaluation metrics: Achievement Rate (AR) and Solved-Task Consistency (STC). Our results show that both, the plan formulation and the underlying LLM generating the plan, significantly influence web-agent robustness and task success.

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.LG

查看论文
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.159ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Make Mechanistic Interpretability Auditable: A Call to Develop Guidelines via Continuous Collaborative Reviewing

Michael Lan Martian, Narmeen Fatimah Oozeer, Chaithanya Bandi Northwestern University, Philip Quirke, Austin Meek University of Delaware, Fazl Barez University of Oxford, Amir Abdullah Thoughtworks

原文摘要

While mechanistic interpretability (MI) has produced important insights into neural network internals, the field has yet to establish a standardized system to audit experiments. As such, many of its findings remain underutilized in safety-critical applications such as medical AI and autonomous systems, as stakeholders cannot certify their validity. Recent work demonstrates this concretely: two papers found conflicting conclusions for the same behavior, and a third study revealed that both were partially correct but incomparable due to methodological inconsistencies. Without standardized auditing, such ambiguities hinder adoption in high-stakes contexts requiring strong correctness guarantees. We call for the MI community to work towards developing a novel reviewing system that complements peer review via: (1) Continuous reviewing supported by a Collaborative Reviewing Platform where meta-science results and discussions (such as critiques, negative results, post-hoc extensions, reproductions, replications, and partial results) that fit outside of papers are organized and discussed, allowing for comments and revisions to be made at any time (2) Generalizing good practices found on this platform into expert-verified guidelines and protocols to improve auditing efficiency, and (3) Source-based auditing systems that track arguments which claims depend on. This position paper encourages constructive debate over the necessity, design and implementation of such a framework, providing early concrete examples to help catalyze these dialogues. Overall, we propose that auditing MI itself is essential for its application in AI safety, industry, and governance.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1CVF · CVPR 2026:cvf:530b7a6fed8696451d354fc99dfac8c4CVF · CVPR 2026

Unified Vector Floorplan Generation via Markup Representation

Shiohara, Kaede, Yamasaki, Toshihiko

原文摘要

Automatic residential floorplan generation has long been a central challenge bridging architecture and computer graphics, aiming to make spatial design more efficient and accessible. While early methods based on constraint satisfaction or combinatorial optimization ensure feasibility, they lack diversity and flexibility. Recent generative models achieve promising results but struggle to generalize across heterogeneous conditional tasks, such as generation from site boundaries, room adjacency graphs, or partial layouts, due to their suboptimal representations. To address this gap, we introduce Floorplan Markup Language (FML), a general representation that encodes floorplan information within a single structured grammar, which casts the entire floorplan generation problem into a next token prediction task. Leveraging FML, we develop a transformer-based generative model, Floorplan Markup Language Model (FMLM), capable of producing high-fidelity and functional floorplans under diverse conditions. Comprehensive experiments on the RPLAN dataset demonstrate that FMLM, despite being a single model, surpasses the previous task-specific state-of-the-art methods.

cs.CV · cs.CL

Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · 2026 · 正式发表

查看论文
CVF · CVPR 2026 ↗PDF ↗