跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1622新增论文
+1249其中 AI 相关
+172已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 14:12 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-11 13:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 14:23 — 2026-11-11 14:23(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 14:12最近发现新增版本:2026-11-11 13:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,672 已收录论文18,320 AI 相关6,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 14:10(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.12286

VLA-MOPD: On-Policy Distillation for Multi-Task VLA Policy Consolidation

Yongxuan Lv, Zhen Fang, Lichen Man, Hao Li, Pu Li, Hengyi Wang, Langfeng Cao, Lin Chen 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

Physical intelligence requires embodied agents to ground language in observations and execute actions while retaining useful skills. Vision-language-action (VLA) policies offer a shared interface, but task-specific post-training often produces separate specialists. Consolidation is difficult: mixed-task reinforcement learning provides sparse trajectory-level credit, while offline distillation may miss student-visited observations and endpoint distillation does not supervise intermediate action-generation states. We introduce VLA Multi-teacher On-Policy Distillation (VLA-MOPD), a protocol for consolidating flow-matching VLA specialists. After acquiring task or suite experts, a shared student collects robot rollouts and queries the instruction-routed frozen teacher at each visited observation and intermediate ordinary differential equation (ODE) state. Detached per-flow-step transition targets supervise valid action chunks through a masked local matching loss; an optional reference-policy term supports retention on other tasks. Starting from one trajectory per LIBERO task, VLA-MOPD raises mean success-once from 75.4% to 98.9%, compared with 98.15% for endpoint action distillation. It improves mean RoboTwin 2.0 success from 73.0% to 89.3%; on a Piper robot, two consolidation rounds improve average success from 70.0% to 90.0%. In a near-matched Spatial-adaptation study, reference matching limits the Object suite decrease to 3.0 points, versus 13.2 without the reference term.

cs.RO · cs.CV