跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1072新增论文
+845其中 AI 相关
+94已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 19:37 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 13:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 19:43 — 2026-11-09 19:43(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 19:37最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 13:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-07 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

18,172 已收录论文15,506 AI 相关4,527 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 19:35(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09045

When to Trust the BIM: Identifiability-Aware LiDAR-Inertial--BIM Fusion under As-Built Deviations

Yujie Zhang, Yuxuan Guo, Xinbao Sun, Chunlei Zhao, Langqi Miao, Xiaohui Jia, Jinyue Liu

原文摘要

Building information models (BIM) can provide a global geometric reference for robot localization with LiDAR-inertial odometry (LIO). However, as-built deviations from the as-designed model mean that a disagreement between a scan and the BIM may arise from a pose error, an offset wall surface (an as-built deviation or an unmodeled object in front of the wall), or a shifted room, and in some geometries these explanations produce identical observations. In this paper, we formalize this attribution problem as fault identification over three fault classes and derive a geometric criterion for when attribution is possible. Building on it, we propose an identifiability-aware method that reports an attribution only when the fault is attributable; otherwise, it retains the candidates, defers BIM updates and BIM-based pose corrections in the ambiguous directions, and recovers once new references arrive. In the pre-registered two-dimensional study, on cases whose fault is detectable but not attributable, the method's conditional error rate was 0.83%, against 31.67% for a baseline with uncertainty-based abstention at the same answer rate. On the 5,600 attributable cases, the method reported a unique attribution 5,574 times, with no incorrect attributions. In paired fault injections in a laboratory room with its IFC model and on three floors of the SLABIM dataset, it raised no off-target attribution (0 of 168 conditions in the laboratory; 0 of 1,302 on SLABIM) and attributed all eight laboratory faults predicted to be attributable, whereas both reproduced baselines raised off-target structural flags in every setting.

cs.RO