跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1164新增论文
+869其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 04:56 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 05:09 — 2026-11-06 05:09(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 04:56最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 04:54(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02066

Large Geometry Models Are Priors For Fast Physics Pretraining

Maggie Chlon, Leon Chlon

Language and vision models became data-efficient by pretraining on plentiful unlabelled data; physical field models have such data, over ten million 3D shapes, but geometry pretraining designs its targets rather than deriving them from the physics. Euler-Lagrange geometry pretraining derives them: for attached flow, a shape enters the flow's Euler-Lagrange equation only through coefficients that distance and normal line (the normal up to sign) fix to first order. Their reconstruction error therefore bounds what a representation loses about any field, and fine-tuning on costly simulations need only assemble the global field. We realise it in AREALS, a masked surface autoencoder whose areal tokens carry position, normal and area, pretrained self-supervised and sign-free on 61,822 raw meshes. Because the operating condition enters only through the far field, sensors can supply it: AREALS completes a hidden field in one forward pass without condition labels. It matches the accuracy of the same architecture trained from scratch with half the simulations on DrivAerML and DrivAerNet++ and about a quarter on WindsorML. On DoubleDelta wings, 20 sensors give $3.9\times$ and $4.0\times$ lower field and force error than GABI, a Bayesian inversion method with a learned prior, and beyond the training angles pretraining halves the error.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · stat.ML
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36138

Symmetry Breaking Is the Price of Finite Capacity

Maggie Chlon, Leon Chlon

If rotating a problem never changes its answer, one might expect its best model to be rotation-invariant; we show that this fails, predictably and by an exact amount, when capacity is limited. A symmetry groups a model's directions into blocks of equally strong directions, a symmetric model must use each block whole, and when the budget cuts a block every optimal model breaks the symmetry. For a Gaussian problem with a $k$-unit bilinear predictor, the log-loss price of symmetry is exactly $(U_k-I_k)/(2σ^2)$, the signal of the best $k$ directions minus that of the best whole blocks. Because an attention head compares tokens through a similarity of rank at most its head dimension, whatever computation precedes it, the same price governs heads fitted to a symmetric similarity by squared error, and heads trained this way on three-dimensional directions break symmetry at exactly the predicted head dimensions, with the predicted rotation sensitivity (RMSE 0.004). Under softmax attention, flatter attention restores the predicted symmetric head where tested, while with peaked attention broken heads beat every whole-shell symmetric head at 16 of 20 head dimensions. We give a procedure that separates capacity-driven breaking from other causes.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

stat.ML · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗