Before AI can be trusted to discover new science, it should be able to reproduce what science already knows. Reproduction provides a rigorous checkpoint for an AI scientist: the target claim is known, yet recovering it still requires translating an incomplete scientific description into an executable experiment and producing evidence that can be independently verified. Existing research-reproduction benchmarks largely focus on AI and machine learning, where experiments share relatively homogeneous software stacks. Extending this capability across scientific disciplines introduces a different challenge: agents must operate domain-specific scientific software, make physical and numerical choices, diagnose long-running computations, and distinguish valid evidence from merely plausible outputs. We introduce PAPERBENCHX, a benchmark of 93 expert-constructed paper-reproduction tasks spanning 12 research areas across electromagnetics, photonics, chemistry, materials science, biology, and robotics. Each task provides the source paper, a public task specification, and a domain-native scientific environment involving specialized scientific software. Agents must reconstruct a key experiment, execute and diagnose it, and deliver a runnable workflow that supports the target scientific claim. To evaluate scientific validity rather than surface-level agreement, we replay every submission from scratch and score only regenerated evidence against expert-validated criteria. Across 10 frontier agent configurations, the best configuration fully reproduces only 14% tasks under the 90% threshold. Meanwhile, mean rubric scores range from 27.53% to 59.08%, indicating that substantial partial progress rarely translates into complete scientific reproduction. These results reveal a large gap between paper understanding and reliably producing reproducible scientific evidence.
Zeyuan Feng, Ali Fuat Sahin, Santiago Thorup, Somil Bansal
Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) reachability provides a principled framework for synthesizing safety certificates and robust controllers for safety-critical robotic systems. However, applying reachability analysis to high-dimensional nonlinear systems remains challenging: classical grid-based solvers suffer from the curse of dimensionality, continuous-time neural solvers require accurate spatial value gradients, and reinforcement-learning-based approaches often suffer from weak boundary anchoring and non-stationary adversarial policy optimization. We propose a discrete-time neural reachability framework for control-disturbance-affine systems that learns backward reachable tubes (BRTs) and backward reach-avoid tubes (BRATs) through Bellman-Isaacs value propagation. Our key idea is to combine equation-driven self-supervision with structured policy learning: rather than computing explicit PDE-gradients, we exploit the bang-bang structure of optimal safety interventions to construct approximate teacher actions from gradient-free value probes, converting adversarial actor learning into supervised policy learning. To stabilize long-horizon value propagation, we leverage the learned actor to train the value function backward from the terminal boundary using a windowed temporal curriculum, where each window is used as the boundary condition for the next window. Across benchmark problems up to 80 dimensions, our method learns accurate reachability value functions while improving stability over existing learning-based solvers. We further demonstrate observation-space scalability on F1-tenth racing with over 16,000-dimensional egocentric inputs. The learned safety filter generalizes zero-shot to unseen tracks and transfers to a physical RC car, achieving real-time robust collision avoidance.
Xianzhen Luo Harbin Institute of Techology, Wenzhen Zheng, Qingfu Zhu Harbin Institute of Technology, Rongyi Zhang, Houyi Li Fudan University, Siming Huang, YuanTao Fan, Wanxiang Che Harbin Institute of Technology
Code Large Language Models (LLMs) are revolutionizing software engineering. However, scaling laws that guide the efficient training are predominantly analyzed on Natural Language (NL). Given the fundamental differences like strict syntax between code and NL, it is unclear whether these laws are directly applicable to code. To address this gap, we conduct the first large-scale empirical study of scaling laws for code, comprising 117 experimental runs with model sizes from 0.2B to 3.8B and training tokens from 2B to 128B. We fit the Chinchilla law and the Farsser law. First, the results show that the more expressive Farseer law offers greater accuracy. Second, the analysis reveals that Code LLMs scale effectively with model size. Crucially, code represents a more data-hungry regime, requiring a substantially higher data-to-parameter ratio than NL. Finally, two additional sets of experiments on code-NL mixtures show that NL benefits resource-constrained scenarios, but becomes a detriment at higher compute budgets.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Xiaoyuan Wu Carnegie Mellon University, Roshni Kaushik Fujitsu Research and Development Center Co. Ltm., Wenkai Li Fujitsu Research and Development Center Co. Ltm., Lujo Bauer Carnegie Mellon University, Koichi Onoue
Large language models (LLMs) are rapidly being adopted for tasks like draftingemails, summarizing meetings, and answering health questions. In thesesettings, users may need to share private information (e.g., contactdetails, health records). To evaluate LLMs’ ability to identify and redactsuch information, prior work introduced real-life, scenario-based benchmarks(e.g., ConfAIde, PrivacyLens) and found that LLMs can leak privateinformation in complex scenarios. However, these evaluations relied on proxy LLMs to judge the helpfulnessand privacy-preservation quality of LLM responses, rather than directlymeasuring users’ perceptions. To understand how users perceive the helpfulness and privacy-preservationquality of LLM responses to privacy-sensitive scenarios, we conducted auser study (n=94) using 90 PrivacyLens scenarios. We found that users hadlow agreement with each other when evaluating identical LLM responses. Incontrast, five proxy LLMs reached high agreement, yet each proxy LLM hadlow correlation with users’ evaluations. These results indicate that proxy LLMs cannot accurately estimate users’ wide range of perceptions of utility and privacy inprivacy-sensitive scenarios. We discuss the need for more user-centeredstudies to measure LLMs’ ability to help users while preserving privacy,and for improving alignment between LLMs and users in estimating perceivedprivacy and utility.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Zhonghang Yuan University of Science and Technology of China and Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Zhefan Wang Fudan University, Fang Hu Shanghai Innovation Institute and Fudan University, Zihong Chen, Jinzhe Li, Gang Li Fudan University, Jie Ying Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Huanjun Kong 等 10 位作者
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated promising potential to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in domains such as mathematics and coding. However, its applications on knowledge-intensive domains have not been effectively explored due to the scarcity of high-quality verifiable data. Furthermore, current RLVR focuses solely on the correctness of final answers, leading to the limitations of flawed reasoning and sparse reward signals. In this work, we propose Knowledge-to-Verification (K2V), a framework that extends RLVR to knowledge-intensive domains through automated verifiable data synthesis, while enabling verification of the LLM’s reasoning process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that K2V enhances the reasoning of LLM in knowledge-intensive domains without significantly compromising the model’s general capabilities. This study also suggests that integrating automated data synthesis with reasoning verification is a promising direction to enhance model capabilities in these broader domains.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Reasoning segmentation requires models to ground complex, implicit textual queries into precise pixel-level masks. Existing approaches rely on a single segmentation token , whose hidden state implicitly encodes both semantic reasoning and spatial localization, limiting the model’s ability to explicitly disentangle what to segment from where to segment. We introduce AnchorSeg, which reformulates reasoning segmentation as a structured conditional generation process over image tokens, conditioned on language grounded query banks. Instead of compressing all semantic reasoning and spatial localization into a single embedding, AnchorSeg constructs an ordered sequence of query banks: latent reasoning tokens that capture intermediate semantic states, and a segmentation anchor token that provides explicit spatial grounding. We model spatial conditioning as a factorized distribution over image tokens, where the anchor query determines localization signals while contextual queries provide semantic modulation. To bridge token-level predictions and pixel-level supervision, we propose Token–Mask Cycle Consistency (TMCC), a bidirectional training objective that enforces alignment across resolutions. By explicitly decoupling spatial grounding from semantic reasoning through structured language grounded query banks, AnchorSeg achieves state-of-the-art results on ReasonSeg test set (67.7% gIoU and 68.1% cIoU). All code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/rui-qian/AnchorSeg.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表