Xudong Shen, li Yuan, Ye Chen, Xin Wu South China University of Technology, Yi Cai South China University of Technology, Zhiyong Wu Tsinghua University
While Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong semantic capabilities, their resilience to manipulative linguistic patterns such as logical fallacies remains an underexplored area. Prior work has focused on the ability of LLMs to identify or classify fallacies, but their robustness against these fallacies in persuasive contexts remains largely unexplored.To address this gap, we introduce LoFa (Logical Fallacy), a comprehensive benchmark to evaluate LLM robustness against fallacies. We first construct the LoFa dataset via a multi-agent pipeline, pairing factual questions with fallacious arguments. Then, we develop a multi-round debate framework to assess model resilience under sustained attacks.Furthermore, to disentangle robustness from a model’s inherent knowledge limitations, we propose a new metric, LFR@k (Logical Fallacy Resistance), to quantify performance. Our experiments reveal that different LLMs exhibit varied robustness to distinct types of fallacies, highlighting unique vulnerability profiles across models.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Peidong Wang, Zhiming Ma SmartFlowAI, Xin Dai, YongKang Liu Northeast University, Shi Feng Northeastern University, China, Xiaocui Yang Northeastern University, Wenxing Hu, Zhihao Wang Northeastern University 等 11 位作者
Existing fraud detection methods predominantly rely on transcribed text, suffering from ASR errors and missing crucial acoustic cues like vocal tone and environmental context. This limits their effectiveness against complex deceptive strategies. To address these challenges, we first propose SAFE-QAQ, an end-to-end comprehensive framework for audio-based slow-thinking fraud detection. First, the SAFE-QAQ framework eliminates the impact of transcription errors on detection performance. Secondly, we propose rule-based slow-thinking reward mechanisms that systematically guide the system to identify fraud-indicative patterns by accurately capturing fine-grained audio details, through hierarchical reasoning processes. Besides, our framework introduces a dynamic risk assessment framework during live calls, enabling early detection and prevention of fraud. Experiments on the TeleAntiFraud-Bench demonstrate that SAFE-QAQ achieves dramatic improvements over existing methods in multiple key dimensions, including accuracy, inference efficiency, and real-time processing capabilities. Currently deployed and analyzing over 70,000 calls daily, SAFE-QAQ effectively automates complex fraud detection, reducing human workload and financial losses. Code: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/SAFE-QAQ.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
ZhenChun Xu, Yi Cai South China University of Technology, Dajun Zheng, li Yuan, Mengchen Zhao South China University of Technology, Qixiang Wang, Jiexin Wang
With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), automated code generation has made remarkable progress. Recent studies explore multi-agent collaboration and adopt planning–coding–debugging workflows to enhance performance. However, these approaches are constrained by rigid, predefined workflows that fail to flexibly adjust their plans and lack effective verification of intermediate reasoning steps. In this work, we propose MavenCoder, a model-adaptive and verification–enhanced framework for competition-level code generation. MavenCoder leverages adaptive assessment aligned with the model’s capabilities to select planning strategies, while providing timely feedback and correction via multi-perspective verification. This adaptive problem-solving paradigm mitigates earlier limitations by enabling flexible planning and timely error correction. Compared with existing state-of-the-art approaches, MavenCoder achieves superior pass@1 results across multiple benchmarks, achieving 87.5% on LiveCodeBench, 93.9% on HumanEval+, 81.7% on MBPP+, and 46.1% on CodeContests, outperforming recent agent-based systems with improvement exceeding 3%–40%.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL · cs.MA
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表