让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04077

更新于 2026-11-03

From topology-optimization brief to solver-checked release: separating intent, admissibility and acceptance knowledge for language agents

Shaoliang Yang, Jun Wang

原文摘要

An engineering solver can converge even when a language agent has misread the user's problem. AgenticTO makes this distinction inspectable by keeping three records separate: the proposed problem specification, deterministic formulation checks, and numerical acceptance of the solved design. We evaluated the workflow on 50 author-built topology-optimization briefs, injected faults, five numerical problems, and complete agent sessions. The tests used linear-elastic models with one load case. Geometry tools raised the primary provider's correct specifications and refusals from 37 to 44 of 50, while also increasing wrong specifications delivered as finished. Input-format feedback alone recovered most of the accuracy gain. The wrong specifications passed the formulation rules, which also missed most injected faults that changed the intended problem. Clarification corrected the remaining errors when an oracle supplied reference facts, but also prompted questions on fully specified briefs. Perfect accuracy under that oracle therefore does not establish performance with engineers. Numerical trials reached 73.7 million elements, although released designs used finer grids than requested. The records expose how a proposed problem becomes an accepted numerical result; agreement with the brief still needs a separate judgment.

cs.CE

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38546

更新于 2026-10-28

Implicit Minor Detection from Multi-Turn Dialogue in High-Risk AI Interactions: A Constrained Self-Evolving LLM Harness

Xiaohan Zhang, Ying Zhao, Ruilin Guo, Xuanyuan Yu, Kaibo Huang, Yukun Wei, Zhongliang Yang, Linna Zhou

原文摘要

In high-risk text interactions, a system may need to estimate whether the current speaker is likely to be a minor before applying age-conditioned safeguards. Many text-based dialogue systems lack strong identity signals such as account information, verified identity, facial data, or device data, and must rely on weak cues that emerge across multiple turns. We formulate implicit minor detection under weak identity information as a high-risk user-attribute inference task and propose a constrained framework comprising a large language model, a Harness, and a Maker-Checker protocol. The framework controls when inference is invoked, requires structured dialogue-linked evidence, and subjects validation-selected Harness revisions to version-level review. On a controlled Chinese benchmark comprising 8,328 multi-turn dialogues, our method improves average precision and minor-class F1 by 7.60 and 6.37 percentage points, respectively, over direct inference using the same LLM family.

cs.CL

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38096

更新于 2026-10-28

Calculation and rejection diverge in language models tested at known mechanical limits

Shaoliang Yang, Jun Wang

原文摘要

When a language model returns engineering quantities with the status "solved", software that trusts it passes them on, even when the requested design is physically impossible. Such failures could reflect poor calculation, how the answer is requested, or a failure to judge feasibility. We set beam loads and disk speeds at known percentages above or below plastic collapse or burst, measured each model's limit calculation separately and tested 12 models in 4,860 calls, including follow-up experiments on new designs. We find that a model can recognize an impossible design when asked only whether it is feasible, yet accept the same design, reporting "solved", when asked for a full answer. Three models accepted beams 10 to 30% beyond collapse despite precise limit calculations in separate questions, and many accepted replies stated the violation. Asked only about feasibility, Opus 5 and Gemini 3.8 Flash rejected every impossible new design they were given, including those accepted in full answers, without false alarms. Rewording when to decline or changing the answer format raised rejection on the original beams, but not consistently on new designs. Software and benchmarks using a model's status should test feasibility judgment and full-answer rejection separately, and report the exact prompt.

cs.CE · cs.AI · cs.CL

版本更新 · v2arXiv:2601.10307

更新于 2026-10-27

The Straight and Narrow: Do LLMs Possess an Internal Moral Path?

Luoming Hu, Jingjie Zeng, Liang Yang, Hongfei Lin

原文摘要

Enhancing the moral alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) is a critical challenge in AI safety. Current alignment techniques often act as superficial guardrails, leaving the intrinsic moral representations of LLMs largely untouched. In this paper, we bridge this gap by leveraging Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) to map and manipulate the fine-grained moral landscape of LLMs. Through cross-lingual linear probing, we validate the shared nature of moral representations in middle layers and uncover a shared yet different moral subspace between English and Chinese. Building upon this, we extract steerable Moral Vectors and successfully validate their efficacy at both internal and behavioral levels. Leveraging the high generalizability of morality, we propose Adaptive Moral Fusion (AMF), a dynamic inference-time intervention that synergizes probe detection with vector injection to tackle the safety-helpfulness trade-off. Empirical results confirm that our approach acts as a targeted intrinsic defense, effectively reducing incorrect refusals on benign queries while minimizing jailbreak success rates compared to standard baselines.

cs.CL

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.34957

更新于 2026-10-26

Consequence-guided clarification: releasing minimum-compliance topology-optimized designs from incomplete specifications

Shaoliang Yang, Jun Wang

原文摘要

A converged topology optimization can solve the wrong problem when loads, supports, or the domain are underspecified. Assuming defaults, or asking the problem's author about every detail, ignores how much each answer changes the design. We propose consequence-guided clarification (CGC), which bases acceptance on computed mechanical consequences. CGC computes a reference design for each of a finite list of complete specifications, called readings. A design is accepted only if its compliance is at most 5% above the reference at every reading consistent with the answers. Otherwise, CGC asks the question whose worst answer leaves the smallest worst-case excess, and withholds acceptance at its question limit. To save optimizations, the screening variant CGC-S postpones some references until a candidate must be checked. We developed and evaluated both on 36 arXiv-derived tasks, treating each of 134 readings in turn as intended and simulating correct answers. In 26 tasks, the default-reading design failed another reading. Apart from always-asked questions on load direction, sign, and material budget, asking everything took 188 questions; CGC and CGC-S each took 105. The acceptance test supplied most of this saving: applying it to the default design alone took 117. Relative to asking everything, CGC-S requested 4.6 extra reference designs per avoided question, each from two optimization starts, counting optimization time only. References are not certified optima: better ones pushed three accepted cases above tolerance, and finer meshes changed some decisions. Within these limits, the test shows which readings a design covers and which details block acceptance.

cs.CE

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1190ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

CogEvolve: A Multimodal Benchmark for Evaluating Relational Reasoning in Semantic Extension

Jingjie Zeng, Huayang Li, Liang Yang Dalian University of Technology, Yuanyuan Sun Dalian University of Technology, Shaowu Zhang Dalian University of Technology, Hongfei Lin

原文摘要

Human cognition excels at extending knowledge through analogy, where word meanings evolve along structured pathways from concrete prototypes to abstract senses via metaphor and metonymy. Do Large Language Models (LLMs) internalize this generative logic, or merely mimic statistical patterns? To investigate this, we introduce CogEvolve, a cognitive linguistic benchmark designed to test these evolutionary pathways across textual and visual modalities. Our evaluation reveals a distinct cognitive profile: models function as “Super-Associators” expert at static recognition yet fail at causal reasoning. In text, they exhibit a Frequency-Primacy Conflation, confusing statistical prevalence with cognitive basicness. Crucially, this reasoning collapses further in the visual domain. We term this deficit the Ungrounded Arrow: models possess high-fidelity concept representations (the “dots”) but lack the transformational operators (the “arrows”) essential for true relational understanding.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1375ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

MPR-GUI: Benchmarking and Enhancing Multilingual Perception and Reasoning in GUI Agents

Ruihan Chen, Qiming Li, Xiaocheng Feng, Weihong Zhong Harbin Institute of Technology, Xiaoliang Yang Harbin Institute of Technology, Yuxuan Gu Harbin Institute of Technology, Zekun Zhou Harbin Institute of Technology, Yunfei Lu Huawei Technologies Ltd. 等 12 位作者

原文摘要

Large Vision–Language Models (LVLMs) have shown strong potential as multilingual Graphical User Interface (GUI) agents, as evidenced by existing GUI benchmarks. However, these benchmarks exhibit two primary limitations: (1) although Perception and Reasoning (P R) capabilities are fundamental for GUI agents, current benchmarks lack fine-grained diagnostics to identify which specific capabilities lead to task failures, hindering targeted improvements; (2) existing benchmarks fail to provide a strictly aligned cross-lingual evaluation environment, introducing confounding factors that prevent isolating the language impact on GUI agent performance. To address these issues, we propose the Multilingual P R GUI Benchmark (MPR-GUI-Bench), featuring strictly aligned environments across six languages and eight fine-grained P R tasks. Our benchmark reveals consistent P R gaps between English and non-English settings, particularly on reasoning-intensive tasks. To leverage the superior English P R capabilities for bridging cross-lingual gaps, we identify layers sensitive to language and propose GUI-XLI, a GUI Cross-Lingual Intervention method that aligns non-English hidden states with their English counterparts at these layers during inference. Experiments show that GUI-XLI effectively reduces the cross-lingual gaps, with an average gain of 6.5% in non-English settings.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1410ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

To Judge or Not to Judge: Can Large Language Models Leverage the Dispute Focus in Legal Judgment?

Luoming Hu, Liang Yang Dalian University of Technology, Jingjie Zeng, Zijie Xing

原文摘要

Civil judicial cases are highly complicated, posing significant challenges for Large Language Models (LLMs) for Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP). While judges manage this complexity through the dispute focus—a mechanism distilling cases into core issues—existing research largely overlooks this tool in favor of generic reasoning frameworks that lack authentic judicial logic. To bridge this gap, we first introduce \textbf{FocalLaw}, the first dataset aligning full-process Chinese civil judicial data through the dispute focus, comprising 1,000 high-quality cases across six causes of action. Building on this dataset, we examine LLMs’ capability to utilize the dispute focus and uncover a counter-intuitive phenomenon: LLMs fail to leverage the dispute focus even with CoT and SFT, which we identify as the “Clerk Trap”.To solve the problem, we propose \textbf{FocalJudge}, a novel framework that leverages the dispute focus to guide LLMs through a structured, judge-like cognitive workflow. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of FocalJudge and offer valuable insights into the interpretability and reliability of LLMs in the legal domain.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.2195ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

LOTUS: Evolving Multimodal Unlearning via Hyperbolic Entailment and Lorentz Transport

Zekun Wang, Jingjie Zeng, Yingxu Li, Hongfei Lin, Liang Yang Dalian University of Technology

原文摘要

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) face critical privacy challenges due to the indiscriminate memorization of sensitive data. Existing unlearning methods, largely adapted from Euclidean paradigms, suffer from a geometric mismatch: they fail to disentangle specific instances from general concepts, causing catastrophic forgetting or unsafe substitution. We introduce LOTUS (Lorentz Transport for Unlearning Strategies), a framework for surgical semantic pruning within the Lorentz manifold. Leveraging hyperbolic geometry’s hierarchical nature, LOTUS employs an Inverted Entailment Cone Loss to sever the inheritance of sensitive concepts and a Lorentz Transport mechanism to align pruned features within the tangent space, ensuring compatibility with Euclidean backbones via a safety refusal prior. Experiments on MLLMU-Bench with LLaVA and Qwen show that LOTUS significantly outperforms baselines, effectively erasing targeted visual data while preserving general utility.

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.573ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

AgentMark: Utility-Preserving Behavioral Watermarking for Agents

Kaibo Huang, Jin Tan, Yukun Wei, Wanling Li, Zipei Zhang, Hui Tian Huaqiao University, Zhongliang Yang Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Linna Zhou Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

原文摘要

LLM-based agents are increasingly deployed to autonomously solve complex tasks, raising urgent needs for IP protection and regulatory provenance. While content watermarking effectively attributes LLM-generated outputs, it fails to directly identify the high-level planning behaviors (e.g., tool and subgoal choices) that govern multi-step execution. Critically, watermarking at the planning-behavior layer faces unique challenges: minor distributional deviations in decision-making can compound during long-term agent operation, degrading utility, and many agents operate as black boxes that are difficult to intervene in directly. To bridge this gap, we propose AgentMark, a behavioral watermarking framework that embeds multi-bit identifiers into planning decisions while preserving utility. It operates by eliciting an explicit behavior distribution from the agent and applying distribution-preserving conditional sampling, enabling deployment under black-box APIs while remaining compatible with action-layer content watermarking. Experiments across embodied, tool-use, and social environments demonstrate practical multi-bit capacity, robust recovery from partial logs, and utility preservation. Code is available at https://github.com/Tooooa/AgentMark.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表