跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+5617新增论文
+4730其中 AI 相关
+108已有论文修订
+122新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-05 02:52 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 03:47各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-04 03:47 — 2026-11-05 03:47(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-05 02:52最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 03:47库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-04 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

14,294 已收录论文12,405 AI 相关3,088 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-05 02:50(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04467

Is Forgetting Unified? Exploring Concept Unlearning in Unified Multimodal Models

Zhongkai Xue, Junkai Chen, Mingcong Lei, Rumo Zhang, Yixiao Liu, Zhimin Sun, Shu Wu, Qiang Liu 等 10 位作者

Unified multimodal models (UMMs) integrate image generation and visual understanding, but are existing single-pathway unlearning methods sufficient to suppress target concepts across both? In this work, we study cross-pathway concept unlearning. Our goal is to prevent a model from both generating images of a target concept and identifying it in input images, while preserving other capabilities. To this end, we introduce UUBench, a diagnostic benchmark covering 30 target concepts and 60 semantically related neighboring concepts. Experiments on representative UMMs show that the evaluated single-pathway methods achieve limited joint forgetting: generation-side editors strongly suppress target generation but yield limited forgetting in visual understanding, while understanding-side baselines struggle to achieve substantial forgetting even in their own pathway. Their direct composition also yields limited joint forgetting. We therefore propose UniForget, achieving joint forgetting rates of 80.0% on BAGEL-7B-MoT and 92.7% on Janus-Pro-7B, outperforming representative baselines. Further analysis reveals trade-offs between joint forgetting and capability preservation.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗