跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 14:18 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 14:18 — 2026-11-07 14:18(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 14:18最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 6 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 14:16(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07753

Neural Collapse on Imbalanced Datasets and Open-Set Scenario

Qiufu Li, Huibing Xiao, Linlin Shen, Yongdong Huang

Neural collapse (NC) describes the elegant geometric structure that sample features and classifier vectors exhibit when a classification model's loss reaches its minimum. Class imbalance, however, generally distorts standard NC. In this paper, we theoretically reformulate NC on imbalanced datasets and in open-set settings. Our analysis is based on an optimization problem over class-wise averaged losses, rather than the global averaged losses used in prior NC studies. We prove that when class-wise averaged losses attain their minima, standard NC is achieved on balanced or imbalanced datasets, for both cross-entropy (CE) and binary cross-entropy (BCE) losses. We further extend the analysis to an open-set-inspired scenario, where some classes contain no training samples yet are still assigned classifier vectors in the losses. We find that in this scenario, when class-wise averaged losses reach their minima, standard NC still emerges on the known classes with training samples, while the classifier vectors of unknown classes without training samples overlap with each other and become orthogonal to those of the known classes. Finally, we analyze Softmax- and Sigmoid-based contrastive losses re-balanced by inverse sample frequency, proving that at their minima on balanced or imbalanced datasets, sample features of different classes likewise form standard NC.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.07741

Comparing Classification and Feature Learning by Analyzing Their Loss Functions in Normalized Spaces with Different Scale Factors

Qiufu Li, Huibin Xiao, Linlin Shen, Weijia Fan, Xi Jia, Yongdong Huang

Classification and feature learning are two closely interrelated fundamental tasks. Feature learning in supervised settings is typically achieved by training classification models, under the common assumption that higher classification accuracy implies better feature quality. In this paper, we first point out that classification accuracy reflects the sample-wise local properties of a model on a dataset, whereas feature learning aims to learn features with good dataset-level global properties, such as intra-class compactness and inter-class separability. From the first principle of feature learning, we redesign the binary cross-entropy (BCE) loss, a counterpart of the cross-entropy (CE) loss used in classification. Then, in normalized feature space, we analyze the minima of the BCE and CE losses and show that both can lead to neural collapse, where sample features from different classes become maximally compact and maximally separated. More importantly, by investigating the convergence behaviors of the two losses as the scale factor $γ$ varies in the normalized space, we reveal how classification accuracy and feature quality change differently across spaces of different sizes. Under a fixed training strategy, a very large $γ$ achieves perfect classification accuracy but slows convergence toward the ideal feature geometry, whereas a very small $γ$ makes classification highly sensitive to small perturbations. A moderate $γ$ is therefore necessary for simultaneously achieving reliable classification and well-structured features. Extensive experiments validate these findings and demonstrate that BCE loss exhibits advantages in long-tail and open-set recognitions, as it better aligns with the global requirements of feature learning.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v5arXiv:2504.15669

UINO-FSS: Unifying Representation Learning and Few-shot Segmentation via Hierarchical Distillation and Mamba-HyperCorrelation

Wei Zhuo, Zhiyue Tang, Wufeng Xue, Hao Ding, Junkai Ji, Linlin Shen

Few-shot semantic segmentation has attracted growing interest for its ability to generalize to novel object categories using only a few annotated samples. To address data scarcity, recent methods incorporate multiple foundation models to improve feature transferability and segmentation performance. However, they often rely on dual-branch architectures that combine pre-trained encoders to leverage complementary strengths, a design that limits flexibility and efficiency. This raises a fundamental question: can we build a unified model that integrates knowledge from different foundation architectures? Achieving this is, however, challenging due to the misalignment between class-agnostic segmentation capabilities and fine-grained discriminative representations. To this end, we present UINO-FSS, a novel framework built on the key observation that early-stage DINOv2 features exhibit distribution consistency with SAM's output embeddings. This consistency enables the integration of both models' knowledge into a single-encoder architecture via coarse-to-fine multimodal distillation. In particular, our segmenter consists of three core components: a bottleneck adapter for embedding alignment, a meta-visual prompt generator that leverages dense similarity volumes and semantic embeddings, and a mask decoder. Using hierarchical cross-model distillation, we effectively transfer SAM's knowledge into the segmenter, further enhanced by Mamba-based 4D correlation mining on support-query pairs. Extensive experiments on PASCAL-5$^i$ and COCO-20$^i$ show that UINO-FSS achieves new state-of-the-art results under the 1-shot setting, with mIoU of 80.6 (+3.8%) on PASCAL-5$^i$ and 64.5 (+4.1%) on COCO-20$^i$, demonstrating the effectiveness of our unified approach.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1111ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

KoCo: Conditioning Language Model Pre-training on Knowledge Coordinates

Yudong Li, Jiawei Cai, Linlin Shen Shenzhen University

Standard Large Language Model (LLM) pre-training typically treats corpora as flattened token sequences, often overlooking the real-world context that humans naturally rely on to contextualize information. To bridge this gap, we introduce Knowledge Coordinate Conditioning (KoCo), a simple method that maps every document into a three-dimensional semantic coordinate. By prepending these coordinates as textual prefixes for pre-training, we aim to equip the model with explicit contextual awareness to learn the documents within the real-world knowledge structure. Experiment results demonstrate that KoCo significantly enhances performance across 10 downstream tasks and accelerates pre-training convergence by approximately 30%. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that explicitly modeling knowledge coordinates helps the model distinguish stable facts from noise, effectively mitigating hallucination in generated outputs.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1228ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Benchmarking Egocentric Clinical Intent Understanding Capability for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models

Shaonan Liu Shenzhen University, Guo Yu, Xiaoling Luo Shenzhen University, Shiyi Zheng, Jie Liu City University of Hong Kong, Wenting Chen, Linlin Shen Shenzhen University

Medical Multimodal Large Language Models (Med-MLLMs) require egocentric clinical intent understanding for real-world deployment, yet existing benchmarks fail to evaluate this critical capability. We introduce MedGaze-Bench, the first benchmark leveraging clinician gaze as a Cognitive Cursor to assess intent understanding across surgery, emergency simulation, and diagnostic interpretation. Our benchmark addresses three fundamental challenges: visual homogeneity of anatomical structures, strict temporal-causal dependencies in clinical workflows, and implicit adherence to safety protocols. We propose a Three-Dimensional Clinical Intent Framework evaluating: (1) Spatial Intent—discriminating precise targets amid visual noise, (2) Temporal Intent—inferring causal rationale through retrospective and prospective reasoning, and (3) Standard Intent—verifying protocol compliance through safety checks. Beyond accuracy metrics, we introduce Trap QA mechanisms to stress-test clinical reliability by penalizing hallucinations and cognitive sycophancy. Experiments reveal current MLLMs struggle with egocentric intent due to over-reliance on global features, leading to fabricated observations and uncritical acceptance of invalid instructions.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL · cs.CV

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1996ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Beyond the Leaderboard: Rethinking Medical Benchmarks for Large Language Models

Wenxuan Wang Renmin University of China, Zizhan Ma The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Guo Yu, Yiu-Fai Cheung Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Meidan Ding Shenzhen University, Jie Liu City University of Hong Kong, Wenting Chen, Linlin Shen Shenzhen University

Large language models (LLMs) show significant potential in healthcare, prompting numerous benchmarks to evaluate their capabilities. However, concerns persist regarding the reliability of these benchmarks, which often lack clinical fidelity, robust data management, and safety-oriented evaluation metrics. To address these shortcomings, we introduce MedCheck, the first lifecycle-oriented assessment framework specifically designed for medical benchmarks. Our framework deconstructs benchmark development into five stages from design to governance, and provides a comprehensive checklist of 46 medically-tailored criteria. Using MedCheck, we conducted an in-depth empirical evaluation of 56 medical LLM benchmarks. Our analysis uncovers widespread, systemic issues, including a profound disconnect from clinical practice, a crisis of data integrity due to unmitigated contamination risks, and a systematic neglect of safety-critical evaluation dimensions like model robustness and uncertainty awareness. Based on these findings, MedCheck is both a diagnostic tool for existing benchmarks and an actionable guideline for a more standardized, reliable, and transparent approach to evaluating AI in healthcare.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗