跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-10 16:25 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-09 16:34 — 2026-11-10 16:34(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-10 16:25最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-10 16:24(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.09197

Safe Reinforcement Learning via Probabilistic Option Shielding

Gian Luca Ascari, Isidoro Tamassia, Ying Jiao, Luc De Raedt, Giuseppe Marra

原文摘要

Shielding is a safe reinforcement learning technique that provides safety guarantees while learning, by blocking unsafe actions. Traditional shielding relies on a complete model of the environment to provide long-term guarantees. Probabilistic logic shielding (PLS) lifts the requirement of having such model, but only considers safety in the short term, typically looking only one or few steps ahead. We propose Probabilistic Option Shielding (POS), which extends PLS to the option level, recovering long-horizon safety without reintroducing the need for a complete environment model. POS learns a model-free critic directly from one-step PLS signals, to estimate the probability that an entire option will complete safely under uncertainty. We evaluate POS on safe navigation tasks in the LogiCity environment, and show that it achieves considerably safer training while matching the task performance of standard step-level PLS and other safety related reinforcement learning baselines.

cs.AI · cs.LG