Recursive self-improvement (RSI) in scientific research aims to improve agents' research capabilities through their own experimental experience. Scientific agent swarms can combine evidence and implementations from different research directions to guide their agents' subsequent experiments. However, poor experimental results can leave unclear whether to revise a hypothesis or its implementation, while overall program scores can hide components useful to other agents. To address these challenges, we introduce SwarmRSI, a framework that evolves scientific agent swarms for recursive self-improvement. We devise Feedback-Guided Swarm Mutation to refine hypotheses and their implementations using experimental feedback from other agents. We also propose Complementary Swarm Recombination to reuse retained hypotheses and complementary program components across agents, allowing partial results to support new research. Recursive Swarm Evolution integrates both mechanisms into a feedback loop, using new experimental evidence to guide subsequent research. Experiments on OpenProblems, NatureBench and MLE-Bench Lite demonstrate SwarmRSI's state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance. Further evaluations show that accumulated research experience improves performance on held-out tasks. Biologists also reproduce its programs for follow-up biological analyses.
LLM-based assistants on web-scale service platforms increasingly address local-service needs through multi-step planning and tool use. Under dynamic business conditions and evolving user needs, outcome-level evaluation offers limited evidence of where execution fails or how service drifts across continued interaction. We present ATLAS, a dual-horizon diagnostic evaluation framework for industrial tool-use agents. Within-turn evaluation uses trajectory-wise signals across thinking and reflection, tool and skill execution, and response generation to identify execution failures and unmet capability requirements. Across-turn evaluation uses user-wise signals spanning multiple lifecycles to diagnose failures in maintaining or updating user intent, constraints, and corrections. Fine-grained signals use rule-based checks and LLM judgments with explicit evidence scopes and decision boundaries. To support reliable diagnosis at production scale, LLM judges are calibrated against dynamically maintained references from business logs, and selected judges are distilled into compact diagnostic models. The resulting diagnostic profiles help developers attribute failures, prioritize targeted interventions, and reassess improvements. Applied in Meituan Xiaotuan, a million-scale DAU local-services assistant, ATLAS achieves high diagnostic fidelity across calibrated judges and distilled models. Blinded human auditing and a 14-day online A/B test with nearly two million users per arm confirm that the ATLAS-guided agent improves recommendation relevance, factual reliability, user engagement (+2.84% answer read-through rate), and order volume (+6.13% paid orders), leading to full production deployment.
Xuyang Zhi, Peilun Zhou Xiaohongshu, Chengqiang Lu Xiaohongshu, Hang Lv University of Science and Technology of China, Yiwei Liang, Rongyang Zhang, Yan Gao, Yiwu Xiaohongshu 等 13 位作者
The evolution of Large Language Models (LLMs) is shifting the focus from single, verifiable tasks toward complex, open-ended real-world scenarios, imposing significant challenges on the post-training phase. In these settings, the scale and complexity of reward systems have grown significantly, transitioning toward multi-objective formulations that encompass a comprehensive spectrum of model capabilities and application contexts. However, traditional methods typically rely on fixed reward weights, ignoring non-stationary learning dynamics and struggling with data heterogeneity across dimensions. To address these issues, we propose SPARD, a framework that establishes an automated, self-paced curriculum by perceiving learning progress to dynamically adjust multi-objective reward weights and data importance, thereby synchronizing learning intent with data utility for optimal performance. Extensive experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that SPARD significantly enhances model capabilities across all domains. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/USTC-StarTeam/SPARD.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Austin Xu Anthropic, Yilun Zhou Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Xuan-Phi Nguyen, Caiming Xiong Salesforce Research, Shafiq Joty Nanyang Technological University and SalesForce.com
To keep pace with the increasing velocity of large language models (LLM) development, model output evaluation has transitioned away from time-consuming human evaluation to automatic evaluation, where LLMs themselves are tasked with assessing and critiquing other model outputs. LLM-as-judge models are a class of generative evaluators that excel in evaluating relatively simple domains, like chat quality, but struggle in reasoning intensive domains where model responses contain more substantive and challenging content. To remedy existing judge shortcomings, we explore training judges with reinforcement learning (RL). We make three key contributions: (1) We propose the Equivalent Initial State Group Relative Policy Optimization (EIS-GRPO) algorithm, which allows us to train our judge to be robust to positional biases that arise in more complex evaluation settings. (2) We introduce ReasoningJudgeBench, a benchmark that evaluates judges in diverse reasoning settings not covered by prior work. (3) We train Judge for Reasoning (J4R), a 7B judge trained with EIS-GRPO that outperforms GPT-4o and the next best small judge by 6.7% and 9%, matching or exceeding the performance of larger GRPO-trained judges on both JudgeBench and ReasoningJudgeBench.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表
Tenghao Huang, Kung-Hsiang Huang SalesForce.com, Prafulla Kumar Choubey SalesForce.com, Yilun Zhou Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Muhao Chen University of California, Davis, Jonathan May USC/ISI, Chien-Sheng Wu Salesforce AI
Web agents, which couple language models with browsing and tool-use capabilities, show promise as open web assistants. Yet progress is increasingly limited by the lack of scalable, process-level supervision. Existing benchmarks are largely manually constructed, providing only coarse start–goal annotations without intermediate trajectories, while recent automatic generation efforts remain expensive, biased, and shallow. These limitations prevent reliable training and evaluation of agents that must generalize to realistic, multi-hop, cross-page tasks. We introduce a scalable framework GTA that integrates crawling, retrieval-based seeding, in-context generation, and automated quality control to produce realistic tasks paired with executable trajectories. This design decouples crawling from generation for greater efficiency, grounds tasks in the site graph to enforce compositionality, and ensures dense supervision through deterministic replays and systematic validation. We instantiate the pipeline on over 50 websites covering e-commerce, government, forums, and news, with multilingual and multi-hop coverage. The resulting benchmark reveals a significant human–agent performance gap and enables detailed diagnostics. Our contributions are three-fold: (i) formalizing multi-hop web-agent task generation, (ii) proposing an efficient and validated pipeline for automatic data creation, and (iii) releasing a dynamic benchmark with reproducible evaluation.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表