跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 17:39 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 18:02 — 2026-11-08 18:02(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 17:39最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 17:37(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.02107

ZT-DAC: ML-Driven Dynamic Access Control Policy for Zero Trust in DER Networks

Arun B. Chandrasekaran, Damilola Popoola, Souradeep Bhattacharya, Manimaran Govindarasu

原文摘要

The increasing penetration of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) in the smart grid has significantly expanded the cyber-attack surface. Traditionally, DER networks rely on static role-based access control (RBAC) mechanisms that assume persistent trust after authentication. This limitation enables adversaries to maintain unauthorized privileges and move laterally across DER systems, disrupting grid operations. Although attribute-based access control (ABAC) enables fine-grained and context-aware access decisions, it does not fully eliminate implicit trust. Zero Trust (ZT) principles can be incorporated to enhance ABAC policies. This paper proposes a dynamic access control framework for implementing ZT in DER networks (ZT-DAC). The proposed solution employs a two-stage verification process and integrates an Open Policy Agent (OPA)-based RBAC with a machine learning (ML)-based ABAC to enforce continuous and adaptive trust score assessment. To support realistic DER operations, a DER-specific access control model is developed and used to generate a domain-informed dataset of access requests incorporating both legitimate and adversarial behaviors. Experimental results on the dataset show that the OPA-based decision layer achieves \(91.92\%\) accuracy, with a False Positive Rate of \(14.45\%\), while the ML model achieves a Mean Absolute Error of \(2.074\) and an \(R^2\) of \(0.891\) in trust-score prediction. The ABAC layer achieves \(93.27\%\) accuracy, with a FPR of \(3.88\%\), validating its practical feasibility within realistic DER environments.

cs.CR · cs.AI