跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1032新增论文
+792其中 AI 相关
+128已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 06:59 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 07:06 — 2026-11-12 07:06(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 06:59最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 06:57(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.29963

Honeyval: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for LLM-powered HTTP Honeypots

Mark Vero, Fabian Kaczmarczyck, Ivan Petrov, Ilia Shumailov, Jamie Hayes, Niels Heinen, Tianqi Fan, Luca Invernizzi 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Honeypots are decoy systems mimicking real system components designed to defend against cyber attacks. Recently, LLMs increasingly serve as simulation backbones for honeypots. They enable defenders to construct high-interaction honeypots with low system security risks. However, LLM-powered honeypot development lacks a unified evaluation framework. Most evaluations consist of measuring response similarity on fixed commands, manual testing, or real-world deployment. These methods are often not scalable for development, reproducible across evaluations, representative of practical attacks, or adaptable to various attacker and honeypot configurations. In this work, we bridge this gap and propose Honeyval, a comprehensive evaluation framework for LLM-powered HTTP honeypots. We address the limitations of prior evaluations by grounding the honeypots in 16 backend applications, using AI hacking agents as attackers, employing two control tasks to monitor agent and honeypot capabilities across customizations, and defining clear and verifiable exploit goals for the attacker. Using Honeyval, we conduct an extensive evaluation of recent cost-efficient LLMs as HTTP honeypots. Our experiments highlight the promise of LLM-powered honeypots; they lead to substantially longer interactions with the attacker than rule-based baseline honeypots and are far less frequently detected even by frontier models, all while, on average, preserving a running cost advantage against agentic attackers. Further, we experiment with various honeypot extensions and counter-offensive configurations, observing unique trade-offs, e.g., lower latency at the price of increased detection.

cs.CR · cs.AI · cs.LG

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.11455

Coding Agents Propagate Vulnerabilities in Code Bases

Chenhao Sun, Niels Mündler-Sasahara, Mark Vero, Martin Vechev

原文摘要

LLM-based coding agents are widely used to develop critical production software. Even though coding agents are known to occasionally write vulnerable code, there has not been any investigation into how code base vulnerabilities evolve over time under coding agent contributions. In this work, we close this gap by investigating whether and how vulnerabilities in existing code lead coding agents to introduce similar vulnerabilities in the code they write. We first evaluate coding agents on 96 tasks that require implementing a new backend application in a repository where other applications already exist. Second, we investigate repository-level code generation on 20 pairs of tasks in real C/C++ projects. In each task, the agent is asked to complete code critical to memory safety. We find that in both settings, insecure existing code leads to agents writing vulnerable code more often. In backend generation, insecure neighbors reduce the share of correct and secure implementations by 3.4% on average, and in C/C++ repository-level coding, the average gap between secure and insecure contexts reaches 35.4%. Prompting to follow existing code-style or to be careful about security increases, respectively decreases, how strongly agents propagate vulnerabilities, but neither stops them. When asked to explain their implementation choices, coding agents attribute them to following another code site in 76.5% of cases, even though they recognize the introduced vulnerability in 69.9% of cases. These findings show that agents use existing vulnerabilities as templates for new ones indiscriminatorily, turning each contribution into an opportunity to introduce more vulnerabilities. As such, as agents write a growing share of production code under decreasing human review, code bases can increasingly degrade in security if security vulnerabilities are not thoroughly fixed continuously.

cs.CR