跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-07 13:16 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-06 13:12各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-06 13:44 — 2026-11-07 13:44(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-07 13:16最近发现新增版本:2026-11-06 13:12库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,055 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-07 13:14(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.05750

Follow or Surpass? Collaboration, Sound, and the Recognition of Influence in Lineages of Jazz Trumpet Players

Onur Tuncay Bal, Samuel Coavoux, Nathalia A. Loureiro, Balazs Vedres, Mark Wittek

Cultural fields cohere not only horizontally, through collaboration, but also vertically, through lineages of artistic influence. Considerable attention has been devoted to collaboration networks in various fields of creative production; however, we know less about the structure of artistic influence that is nevertheless key to individual artistic development and the evolution of genres. We examine the structure of such an influence network in a genealogy of 52 prominent jazz trumpet players, combining musicians' discographies, demographic characteristics, geographical locations, and audio analysis of more than 16,000 recordings with exponential random graph models. Direct collaboration, overlap in collaborators, and sonic context similarity, that is, the similarity of the recordings on which players appear, are each associated with an ascribed influence tie, net of the others. Not surprisingly, ascribed ties connect musicians whose recordings share a similar sonic context, but musicians also tend to collaborate with their influences and share collaborators with them. However, players whose recordings share a sonic context and who move in the same circle of collaborators can be thought of as peers or rivals, rather than as influences of each other, because lineage implies a succession predicated on difference as much as on continuity. Taken together, our findings suggest that a field's account of its own evolution is neither a record of who played together nor a map of shared sonic contexts, but a selective ordering that requires both. While our data do not permit a causal account, our aim is to provide a rich and varied methodological strategy and descriptive as well as inferential tools to understand the yet understudied vertical integration of cultural fields through influence ties.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.SI · stat.AP
arXiv ↗PDF ↗