让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

原文摘要

Search-augmented LLM agents can produce deep research reports (DRRs), but verifying claim-level factuality remains challenging. Existing fact-checkers usually target general-domain atomic claims, and there is no benchmark to test whether such verifiers transfer to DRRs.Yet building such a benchmark for DRR fact-checkers is itself difficult because it requires expert judgments over cognitively demanding, domain-specific claims.In a controlled study with PhD-level specialists, unassisted experts achieve only 60.8% accuracy on hidden known-answer claims. We therefore propose evolving benchmarking via Audit-then-Score (AtS), in which labels and rationales remain revisable: when a verifier disagrees with the current benchmark, it submits evidence; an auditor adjudicates the dispute; and accepted revisions update the benchmark before scoring. After three additional AtS rounds, expert accuracy rises to 90.9%, showing that experts are better auditors than one-shot labelers.We instantiate AtS as DeepFactBench, a versioned DRR factuality benchmark with auditable rationales, and introduce DeepFactEval, a claim-level verifier.On the frozen DeepFactBench release, DeepFactEval achieves 83.4% accuracy, outperforming the best prior deep-research and traditional fact-checkers by 14.3 and 24.9 points, respectively, and transferring well to external factuality datasets.