跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 20:30 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 20:59 — 2026-11-12 20:59(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 20:30最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 20:24(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2606.30533

在细粒度负载波动下协调严格SLO与低成本

Reconciling Strict SLOs with Low Cost under Fine-Grained Load Fluctuations

Dilina Dehigama, Shyam Jesalpura, Zeyu Xu, Marton Nemeth, Shengda Zhu, Marios Kogias, Boris Grot

AI 速读 基于摘要

Spandana通过将SLO保障与成本优化解耦,在应用VM与FaaS之间逐请求调度,以在细粒度负载波动下兼顾严格SLO、高利用率与低成本。

cs.DC

查看原文摘要

Cloud-based online services face significant sub-second load fluctuations while needing to meet strict Service Level Objectives (SLOs). Cluster operators often over-provision resources to protect SLOs, sacrificing utilization and cost efficiency. Existing reactive and proactive autoscalers, serverless (FaaS) deployments, and VM/FaaS hybrid systems fail to reconcile strict SLO compliance with low cost and high utilization under fine-grained load fluctuation. We introduce Spandana, an architecture that addresses this trade off by decoupling SLO enforcement from cost optimization. A lightweight controller colocated with each application VM enforces SLOs by steering each arriving request between the VM and FaaS. Requests that can meet the SLO stay on the VM; the remaining requests are forwarded to a stock FaaS layer such as AWS Lambda. For cost optimization, Spandana's resource allocator determines the most-efficient VM provisioning by accounting for VM cost, FaaS cost, and traffic volatility, allowing the VM pool to run at high utilization. Our evaluation shows that Spandana maintains strict SLO adherence, achieves 76-86% CPU utilization, and reduces cost by 5-44% over three SOTA baselines.