跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 03:03 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 03:09 — 2026-11-09 03:09(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 03:03最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 03:01(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03222

CERBO: Certified Recourse at a Requested Rate for Gradient-Boosted Trees

Farhan Shahriyar Hossain, Taufikur Rahman Fuad, Md. Zarif Bin Hasnat, Md Abrar Jahin, Md Rizwan Parvez

原文摘要

Recourse-aware learning trains models so that people who receive an adverse decision can reverse it with an affordable change. For gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs), the existing method, RABIT, exposes a single recourse weight whose effect on the recourse rate is abrupt and data-dependent, and its training bound cannot certify recourse for any rejected individual. We present Certified Recourse Boosting (CERBO), which takes a requested recourse rate and returns a GBDT with certified actions: it tracks exact additive effort along tree paths, trains against committed boxes (a family of bounds that contains RABIT's and certifies a within-budget action for each training sample) and adjusts the weight after every tree until the certified rate meets the request. A calibration step guarantees the rate on new individuals, and the certifier runs on any tree ensemble, including XGBoost and LightGBM, in milliseconds per person without a solver. In RABIT's own experimental protocol, at equal accuracy, CERBO raises the recourse ratio from 0.90 to 0.99 on FICO and from 0.64 to 0.77 on Bail. Under additive costs on six data sets, it raises the area under the accuracy-recourse frontier in all 12 settings, and in simulated deployments it guarantees recourse to 70% of rejected individuals in 11 of 12 settings, against 2 for RABIT.

cs.LG · cs.AI · cs.CY

版本更新 · v4arXiv:2510.06445

A Survey on Agentic Security: Applications, Threats and Defenses

Asif Shahriar, Md Nafiu Rahman, Sadif Ahmed, Farig Sadeque, Md Rizwan Parvez

原文摘要

In this work we present the first holistic survey of the agentic security landscape, structuring the field around the fundamental pillars of Applications, Threats and Defenses. We provide a comprehensive taxonomy of 274 papers that covers red-teaming, blue-teaming and domain-specific applications, attack surfaces on agentic systems, defense techniques, and both offensive and defensive evaluation frameworks. For each pillar, we first discuss the literature around the taxonomy and then perform a quantitative analysis to understand the patterns across these works. For the applications, we show their security-lifecycle coverage map, compare between red-teaming and blue-teaming agents, and analyze the adversarial use of red-teaming applications. On the threat side, we analyze the entry points and agent-loop stages that attacks target, their specificity to the agentic setting, and the threat models they assume. On the defense side, we analyze the prevailing defense strategies, their cost and security trade-offs, and where in the agent lifecycle they are deployed. Finally, we provide a deatiled cross-cutting analysis, where we map which defenses cover which attack classes and chart trends in agent architecture, backbone model usage, and data modality coverage. Taken together, these findings give a researcher a structural understanding of how agentic capabilities, vulnerabilities, and countermeasures relate to one another, and to identify where the field is concentrated and where it is thin.

cs.CL · cs.AI · cs.CR