跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 06:51 — 2026-11-04 06:51(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38276

MixCards: Evaluating Structured Descriptions of Multi-Source Sound Scenes

Sripathi Sridhar, Yujin Kim, Giovana Morais, Liang-Yuan Wu, Mehmet Atilay Kucukoglu, Prem Seetharaman, Lloyd May, Mark Cartwright 等 9 位作者

Audio captioning benchmarks typically evaluate a single unstructured free-text description of an audio scene, providing limited insight into how a model fails to understand polyphonic audio. A plausible caption may omit a source, or conflate multiple sources into one, or assign an attribute of one source to another, and conventional captioning evaluation cannot locate these errors. We introduce MixCardBench, a benchmark for structured captioning of polyphonic audio, which evaluates models in two stages: first, identifying and temporally localizing the sources in a scene, and second, generating a structured MixCard describing the semantic, temporal, and acoustic properties of each source. The benchmark contains 4884 ecologically plausible synthetic soundscapes with up to nine overlapping speech, music and sound effects sources built from high-quality recordings and source-level annotations, where each source has a reference MixCard. We evaluate six state-of-the-art large audio language models and find substantial limitations in current models, which struggle considerably with speech and sound effects timing and detection, with the strongest model reaching only around 60% mean card-field score. Performance varies significantly across attributes, exposing capability differences that are hidden by aggregate caption scores. We assess the quality and ecological validity of MixCardBench through human validation, distribution matching and a listening study, and show that human corrections have little effect on model rankings, and our synthesized soundscapes are closer to in-the-wild YouTube videos than source guided but otherwise random synthesis. The benchmark dataset and code are publicly available, and demo examples are at https://mixcards-anon.github.io/mixcards-demo/

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.SD · eess.AS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗