Fooling Reward Models with Gibberish: Adversarial Examples Beyond the Semantic Regime
Yuheng Zhang, Mingyue Huo, Minghao Zhu, Mengxue Zhang, Nan Jiang
Reward models (RMs) are widely used as optimization targets in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). We show that leading RMs can assign higher scores to gibberish than to meaningful reference answers. To systematically discover such inputs, we introduce Token Mapping Perturbation Attack (TOMPA), a framework that uses a perturbed token mapping to extend an attack LLM's search beyond natural language. The mapping changes the linguistic meaning of the attack LLM's natural language responses, producing non-linguistic text for the target RM to score. We then use these scalar scores as rewards to train the attack LLM through reinforcement learning to discover non-linguistic adversarial inputs. Experiments against Llama and Qwen RMs demonstrate such attacks using two instantiations: identity token mapping across different tokenizers and random permutation with a shared tokenizer. Against Skywork-Reward-V2-Llama-3.1-8B, ranked first on RewardBench 2, the two mappings achieve mean rewards of +33.64 and +43.78, respectively, compared with +17.48 for GPT-5 reference answers. Their attack success rates are 97.6% and 100%, measured as the percentages of individual responses scoring above their corresponding GPT-5 references. These results show that strong benchmark performance does not ensure robustness to non-linguistic adversarial inputs, exposing a fundamental vulnerability in using RMs as optimization targets.
尚无 AI 解读，展示原文摘要