跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1163新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 07:02 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 09:41 — 2026-11-06 09:41(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 07:02最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 07:00(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2605.18413

Cracks in the Foundation: A Civil Infrastructure Dataset to Challenge Vision Foundation Models

Nicola Farronato, Niccolo Avogaro, Thomas Frick, Mattia Rigotti, Rizwan Ullah Khan, Michele Magno, Konrad Schindler, Cristiano Malossi 等 9 位作者

Automated structural health monitoring is essential to prevent catastrophic infrastructure failures. Precise, pixel-level defect segmentation is needed to accurately assess structural integrity, but progress in defect segmentation for civil infrastructures has been held back by an extreme scarcity of data, which requires costly expert annotation. The need for data is accentuated by algorithmic hurdles intrinsic to the problem, including center-bias and the need to rely more on shape when inspecting nearly textureless building materials. To remove the bottleneck, we introduce Cracks in the Foundation (CiF), the largest and most detailed civil infrastructure (instance) segmentation dataset to date, comprising $\approx$150,000 high-resolution tiles meticulously curated over five years in collaboration with civil engineering experts. With the help of this unprecedented data source, we expose a blind spot of current visual AI: despite the advent of promptable Foundation Models (FMs) and Vision Language Models (VLMs), and despite the impressive abilities of today's specialised segmentation models, it turns out that dense image understanding in the built environment is nowhere near solved. Our evaluations indicate that even the most recent zero-shot FMs face significant challenges when deployed on real-world infrastructure and even the performance of specialised models with domain-specific supervision plateaus at $\approx$25\% mAP. CiF establishes inspection of civil infrastructure, an elementary and seemingly easy perceptual task, as an open challenge that reveals fundamental weaknesses of present-day models trained predominantly on internet images, literally and figuratively highlighting cracks in the current foundation model paradigm. Dataset available at: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ibm-research/cif-dataset

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03392

TinyML Hits the Memory Wall: A Benchmark of Ten Sub-Watt Edge Devices

Pietro Bonazzi, Luigi Capogrosso, Ahmet Celik, Rosanna Manzo, Marco Giordano, Szymon Ruciński, Jonathan Hungerbuehler, Michele Magno

Neural network inference at the edge must fit tight energy budgets. Existing benchmarks compare few devices, do not report energy on a common basis, and omit the newest microcontrollers with an NPU or the 1 GHz Cortex-M85. Hardware-aware design also ranks networks by MAC count, yet no study has tested whether this proxy holds across accelerators. We benchmark sub-watt edge AI hardware by evaluating four CNNs (MobileNetV3, MCUNetV1, EfficientNet, SqueezeNet) and two tiny transformers (MobileViT-XXS, DeiT-tiny) on ten commercial devices: an in-sensor DSP (Sony IMX500), four MCUs with an NPU (STM32N6, Alif Ensemble E7/E8, GreenWaves GAP9), and five MCUs without an NPU (STM32U5, Apollo510B, ESP32-S3 Xtensa LX7, RA8M2, STM32V8). Four devices are novel (Alif E8, Apollo510B, RA8M2, STM32V8). Measured as energy above idle, the IMX500 (0.13-0.35 mJ) uses 1.3-3x less energy than the STM32N6 (0.31-1.05 mJ) on every model; the GAP9 uses the least on MobileNetV3 and the Alif E7 the least on MCUNetV1 and SqueezeNet. All four use 6-34x less energy than the STM32V8 (1.85-3.98 mJ), and the Alif E7 and IMX500 form the power-performance Pareto front. Latency on all four accelerators scales with memory traffic (bytes of weights and activations, r >= 0.98) and not with MACs, so they are memory-bound, while no MCU without an NPU is. The NPU advantage grows with intensity from 1.4x over a 1 GHz Cortex-M85 on MCUNetV1 to 8.2x on SqueezeNet. MAC count is therefore a misleading cost proxy for sub-watt accelerators.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2605.21171

FTerViT: Fully Ternary Vision Transformer

Szymon Ruciński, Pietro Bonazzi, Engin Türetken, Simon Narduzzi, Michele Magno, Nadim Maamari

Ternary Vision Transformers offer substantial model compression, however state-of-the-art methods only ternarize the encoder layers, leaving patch embeddings, LayerNorm parameters, and classifier heads in full precision. In compact models targeting resource-constrained processors, such as microcontrollers, these remaining full-precision components determine the total memory footprint, severely limiting deployment efficiency and on-device feasibility. In this work, we introduce a fully ternarized Vision Transformer in which all weight matrices and normalization parameters are ternarized, while activations remain 8-bit (FTerViT). To this end, we introduce two novel operators: TernaryBitConv2d with per-channel scaling for patch embedding and TernaryLayerNorm. FTerViT is trained using knowledge distillation, followed by a lightweight quantization-aware recovery phase. On a matched DeiT-S backbone, FTerViT reaches 77.47% ImageNet-1K top-1 at 5.81 MB, +3.27 pp over TerViT. With the stronger DeiT-III-S backbone at 384x384 resolution, our ternary W2A8 model achieves 82.43% at 6.09 MB (~15x compression, -2.42 pp vs. FP32). This backbone- and resolution-advantaged result exceeds prior ternary ViTs by up to 8 pp. Finally, we demonstrate the first implementation of ternary vision transformers on a dual-core Xtensa LX7 microcontroller inside the ESP32-S3 system-on-chip. By deploying FTerViT-Small (based on DeiT-III-Small at 224x224 resolution, 5.81 MB), we achieve 79.64% ImageNet-1K top-1 accuracy.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗