让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

版本更新 · v3arXiv:2604.07383

更新于 2026-11-08

SCOT: Soft Correspondence via Optimal Transport for Multi-Source Cross-City Transfer

Yuyao Wang, Min Yang, Meng Chen, Weiming Huang, Yilong Yin, Yongshun Gong

原文摘要

Cross-city transfer uses labeled data from well-instrumented cities to improve prediction in label-scarce ones. The task is difficult when cities have incompatible region partitions and no ground-truth correspondence. Existing methods either rely on heuristic anchors, which can create hubness, or align global distributions, which can over-mix heterogeneous regions. We propose SCOT (Soft Correspondence via Optimal Transport), an optimal transport-based framework for learning explicit, mass-controlled soft correspondences between unequal region sets. SCOT combines an optimal transport-weighted contrastive loss, a one-sided cycle regularizer, and a shared prototype hub for multi-source transfer. Across real-world cities and tasks, SCOT consistently outperforms strong baselines, reducing MAE and MAPE by 5-50%. Additional analyses show that the learned correspondences are selective, region-specific, and robust to heterogeneous settings.

cs.LG

版本更新 · v5arXiv:2511.15974

更新于 2026-11-08

Knowledge and Reasoning Augmented Learning for Language Model Assisted Antimicrobial Decision Support

Zhe Li, Yehan Qiu, Yuntian Huang, Xin Ding, Yujie Chen, Jing Sun, Min Yan, Lei Chen 等 18 位作者

原文摘要

Background: Antimicrobial decision support requires both clinical knowledge and patient-specific reasoning. We developed Knowledge and Reasoning Augmented Learning (KRAL) to improve language model performance on antimicrobial decision-making tasks. Methods: In this retrospective technical study, a 27-billion-parameter student model underwent guideline-grounded supervised fine-tuning followed by Multi-turn Agentic GRPO using clinical reasoning trajectories. Six configurations were evaluated on 123 clinician-validated clinical antimicrobial treatment cases from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) and 100 JAMA Clinical Challenge cases. A language model judge scored responses, and paired tests compared configurations. Component ablations assessed benchmark performance and training stability. Results: On the PUMCH benchmark, KRAL achieved the highest composite score (0.895 on a 0-1 scale), outperforming all five controls (all P<0.001). On JAMA, KRAL scored 0.600 and exceeded the base model with and without retrieval (P = 0.0048 and 0.0499, respectively). Reinforcement learning ablation experiments demonstrate that the reward smoothing can significantly improve the performance and training stability of vanilla GRPO. Conclusions: KRAL improved performance on a single-center clinical antimicrobial benchmark and publicly available JAMA clinical challenge cases by combining guideline-grounded learning with Multi-turn Agentic GRPO. Further external clinical validation is needed to evaluate the practical utility and effectiveness of KRAL.

cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.40238

更新于 2026-10-29

ScienceJudge: Pattern Perturbation Augmentation for Sentence-Level Scientific Claim Verification

Chuhai Cai, Xin Chen, Min Yang, Feng Jiang

原文摘要

Sentence-level scientific claim verification determines whether each sentence in an AI-generated scientific paragraph is supported by a given multimodal evidence bundle. Fine-grained reporting errors often preserve fluent and plausible statements while introducing subtle evidence-claim deviations, making them difficult to detect under sparse and imbalanced supervision. We propose Pattern Perturbation Augmentation (PPA), which models reporting errors as label-specific faithfulness breaking transformations and induces reusable error patterns from labeled examples. PPA applies these patterns to supported claims to construct controlled hard negatives and expands their coverage through pattern-level, operation-level, and cross-domain augmentation. Based on these augmented views, we develop ScienceJudge, which integrates PPA-trained vision-language predictors and instruction-guided LLM predictors through class-weighted ensemble inference. On the local development set, ScienceJudge improves the average score from 0.8124 to 0.8692, achieving a Macro-F1 of 0.8466 and a Paragraph Exact Match score of 0.8919. Our submitted system ranks first on the official NLPCC 2026 Task 10 Track 1 leaderboard with a final score of 0.6890.

cs.CL

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1014ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

Markovian Linguistic-Temporal Bridge: Unlocking the Potential of LLMs for Time Series Forecasting

Siming Sun, Kai Zhang, Xuejun Jiang, Wenchao Meng Zhejiang University, Qinmin Yang

原文摘要

Adapting pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs) for time series forecasting primarily relies on token-level linguistic-temporal alignment, leading to the stacking of logically disjointed tokens as input. While empirically effective, these methods overlook a fundamental capability of LLMs: modeling linguistic logic and structure, rather than merely processing token features. To address this limitation, we propose the \textbf{M}arkovian-\textbf{G}uided \textbf{S}tructure-\textbf{A}ware \textbf{A}lignment (\textbf{MGSAA}). Our core contribution is a framework that transcends pointwise feature matching to achieve global structural isomorphism between the linguistic and temporal domains. Specifically, MGSAA distills latent evolutionary patterns of language within LLMs into a Markovian state transition graph, which is transferred as a structural prior to the time series domain. Under this prior, time series patches are decoded into latent states and then aligned via state-constrained cross-attention. Ultimately, MGSAA generates a token sequence topologically isomorphic to the LLM’s inherent mental structure, reactivating its reasoning capabilities for forecasting. Comprehensive evaluations across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that MGSAA achieves state-of-the-art performance, providing an innovative solution for cross-modal alignment in LLM for time series forecasting. Code is available at https://github.com/sunzju/MGSAA.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1453ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

ReasoningGuard: Safeguarding Large Reasoning Models with Inference-time Safety Aha Moments

Yuquan Wang Fudan University, Mi Zhang Fudan University, Yining Wang Fudan University, Geng Hong Fudan University, Mi Wen Shanghai University of Electric Power, Xiaoyu You East China University of Science and Technology, Min Yang Fudan University

原文摘要

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in reasoning-intensive tasks, but they remain vulnerable to harmful content generation, particularly in the mid-to-late steps of their reasoning processes. Current defense methods, however, depend on costly fine-tuning and additional expert knowledge, which limits their scalability.In this work, we propose ReasoningGuard, an inference-time safeguard for LRMs.It injects timely safety aha moments during the reasoning process to guide the model towards harmless yet helpful reasoning.Our approach leverages the internal attention mechanisms of the LRM to accurately identify key points in the reasoning path, triggering safety-oriented reflections.To safeguard both the subsequent reasoning steps and the final answers, we implement a scaling sampling strategy during decoding to select the optimal reasoning path.With minimal additional inference cost, ReasoningGuard effectively mitigates four types of jailbreak attacks, including recent ones targeting the reasoning process of LRMs. Our approach outperforms nine existing safeguards, providing state-of-the-art defenses while avoiding common exaggerated safety issues.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1619ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

Reasoning While Asking: Transforming Reasoning Large Language Models from Passive Solvers to Proactive Inquirers

Xin Chen Nanjing University, Feng Jiang Shenzhen University of Advanced Technology, Yiqian Zhang, Hardy Chen, Shuo Yan University of Texas at Dallas, Wenya Xie University of Minnesota - Twin Cities, Min Yang, Shujian Huang Nanjing University

原文摘要

Reasoning-oriented Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, yet they remain fundamentally limited by a blind self-thinking paradigm: performing extensive internal reasoning even when critical information is missing or ambiguous. We propose Proactive Interactive Reasoning (PIR), a new reasoning paradigm that transforms LLMs from passive solvers into proactive inquirers that interleave reasoning with clarification. Unlike existing search- or tool-based frameworks that primarily address knowledge uncertainty by querying external environments, PIR targets premise- and intent-level uncertainty through direct interaction with the user. PIR is implemented via two core components: (1) an uncertainty-aware supervised fine-tuning procedure that equips models with interactive reasoning capability, and (2) a user-simulator-based policy optimization framework driven by a composite reward that aligns model behavior with user intent. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning, code generation, and document editing demonstrate that PIR consistently outperforms strong baselines, achieving up to 32.70% higher accuracy, 22.90% higher pass rate, and 41.36 BLEU improvement, while reducing nearly half of the reasoning computation and unnecessary interaction turns. Further reliability evaluations on factual knowledge, question answering, and missing-premise scenarios confirm the strong generalization and robustness of PIR.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.2077ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

TInR: Exploring Tool-Internalized Reasoning in Large Language Models

Qiancheng Xu Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Yongqi Li Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Fan Liu Southeast University, Hongru Wang, Min Yang, Wenjie Li The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

原文摘要

Tool-Integrated Reasoning (TIR) has emerged as a promising direction by extending Large Language Models’ (LLMs) capabilities with external tools during reasoning. Existing TIR methods typically rely on external tool documentation during reasoning. However, this leads to tool mastery difficulty, tool size constraints, and inference inefficiency. To mitigate these issues, we explore Tool-Internalized Reasoning (TInR), aiming at facilitating reasoning with tool knowledge internalized into LLMs. Achieving this goal presents notable requirements, including tool internalization and tool-reasoning coordination. To address them, we propose TInR-U, a tool-internalized reasoning framework for unified reasoning and tool usage. TInR-U is trained through a three-phase pipeline: 1) tool internalization with a bidirectional knowledge alignment strategy; 2) supervised fine-tuning warm-up using high-quality reasoning annotations, and 3) reinforcement learning with TInR-specific rewards. We comprehensively evaluate our method across in-domain and out-of-domain settings. Experiment results show that TInR-U achieves superior performance in both settings, highlighting its effectiveness and efficiency. The codes are attached in the supplementary file for review.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.710ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

Act-Adaptive Margin: Dynamically Calibrating Reward Models for Subjective Ambiguity

Feiteng Fang, Dingwei Chen SUN YAT-SEN UNIVERSITY, Xiang Huang, Ting-En Lin, Yuchuan Wu Alibaba Group, Xiong Liu Alibaba Group, Jing Ye Institute of automation, Chinese academy of science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ziqiang Liu 等 13 位作者

原文摘要

Currently, most reinforcement learning tasks focus on domains like mathematics and programming, where verification is relatively straightforward. However, in subjective tasks such as role-playing, alignment techniques struggle to make progress, primarily because subjective reward modeling using the Bradley-Terry model faces significant challenges when dealing with ambiguous preferences. To improve reward modeling in subjective tasks, this paper proposes AAM (Act-Adaptive Margin), which enhances reward modeling by dynamically calibrating preference margins using the model’s internal parameter knowledge. We design two versions of AAM that efficiently generate contextually-appropriate preference gaps without additional human annotation. This approach fundamentally improves how reward models handle subjective rewards by better integrating generative understanding with preference scoring. To validate AAM’s effectiveness in subjective reward modeling, we conduct evaluations on RewardBench, JudgeBench, and challenging role-playing tasks. Results show that AAM significantly improves subjective reward modeling performance, enhancing Bradley-Terry reward models by 2.95% in general tasks and 4.85% in subjective role-playing tasks. Furthermore, reward models trained with AAM can help downstream alignment tasks achieve better results. Our test results show that applying rewards generated by AAM-Augmented RM to preference learning techniques (e.g., GRPO) achieves state-of-the-art results on CharacterEval and Charm. The code and dataset will be released upon acceptance.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.934ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

来源日期 2026-07-01（仅到月份）

Beyond the Last Frame: Process-aware Evaluation for Generative Video Reasoning

Yifan Li, YuKai Gu, Yingqian Min, Zikang Liu, Yifan Du, Kun Zhou University of California, San Diego, Min Yang Bytedance, Xin Zhao Renmin University of China 等 9 位作者

原文摘要

Recent breakthroughs in video generation have demonstrated an emerging capability termed Chain-of-Frames (CoF) reasoning, where models resolve complex tasks through the generation of continuous frames. While these models show promise for Generative Video Reasoning (GVR), existing evaluation frameworks often rely on single-frame assessments, which can lead to outcome-hacking, where a model reaches a correct conclusion through an erroneous process. To address this, we propose a process-aware evaluation paradigm. We introduce VIPER, a comprehensive benchmark spanning 16 tasks across temporal, structural, symbolic, spatial, physics, and planning reasoning. Furthermore, we propose Process-outcome Consistency (POC@r), a new metric that utilizes VLM-as-Judge with a hierarchical rubric to evaluate both the validity of the intermediate steps and the final result. Our experiments reveal that state-of-the-art video models achieve POC@1.0 only about 20% and exhibit a significant outcome-hacking. We further explore the impact of test-time scaling and sampling robustness, highlighting a substantial gap between current video generation and true generalized visual reasoning. Our benchmark are released at https://github.com/RUCAIBox/VIPER.

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表