跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

论文库

检索计算机领域论文,按研究方向、作者或关键词筛选。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+2已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-15 09:49 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-14 15:09各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-14 10:06 — 2026-11-15 10:06(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-15 09:49最近发现新增版本:2026-11-14 15:09库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,729 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 2 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-15 09:48(北京时间)
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2506.15253

Specification-based Security Evaluation of Real-World Agents Tool-Calling under Long-Horizon Context Tasks

Yuchuan Fu, Minghe Wang, Xiaohan Yuan, Chenlin Zou, Kaitong Jia, Jinfeng Li, Dongxia Wang

原文摘要

As large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed in long-horizon unattended scenarios, security evaluation of them before deployment becomes increasingly essential and challenging. Existing evaluation methods mainly follow the paradigms of LLM-as-a-Judge or Agent-as-a-Judge. However, such judges are themselves often vulnerable to hallucination and can even be affected by perturbations. Furthermore, because capturing full environment states at every step is often prohibitively expensive in open-ended environments, existing evaluations typically rely on textual logs and the final environment state. As a result, they may miss transient violations that are overwritten before the trajectory ends or never reflected in textual logs. We present RAS-Eval, a specification-based security evaluation framework for LLM agents. RAS-Eval uniformly expresses utility and security objectives as Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) specifications over tool-call trajectories and dynamic environment observations, and verifies them with an off-the-shelf model checker. This design addresses both limitations above. First, unlike LLM-as-a-Judge and Agent-as-a-Judge, RAS-Eval derives deterministic verdicts from formally defined properties, eliminating evaluator-side uncertainty and remaining reliable even for long-horizon trajectories. Second, RAS-Eval observes exactly the states on which the verdict depends, making it affordable to monitor the environment throughout execution and detect transient violations that leave little trace in the logs or final environment state. Moreover, we design a multi-agent-based dataset construction pipeline. Using it, we construct a benchmark (https://github.com/lanzer-tree/RAS-Eval) of 200 normal tasks and 800 attack tasks spanning four attack surfaces: indirect prompt injection, tool poisoning, skill code injection, and tool code injection.

cs.CR · cs.AI

新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.04554

SEEK-VAU: Towards Evidence-Faithful Video Anomaly Understanding via Agentic Search

Minghe Wang, Weijun Zeng, Dapeng Luo, Xinyue Wang, Nong Sang

原文摘要

Most video anomaly understanding (VAU) systems still infer anomaly judgments from evidence collected in a feed-forward way under predefined rules, typically sampled frames, or events clustered from such frames. This protocol fails when the collected evidence is incomplete under imperfect predefined rules, because once reasoning begins the model can no longer search for the missing evidence. We address this limitation with SEEK-VAU, which reframes VAU as an agentic search-and-verify interaction protocol under a bounded search budget: instead of passively reasoning over pre-collected evidence, the policy actively gathers evidence across the three stages of an anomaly event chain (precursor, trigger, and aftermath) and verifies its sufficiency before finalization, turning event-chain completeness into an explicit design rather than an outcome of predefined rules. A bounded budget caps the cost of this search, but does not by itself teach the policy where to look or when to stop. To make this behavior learnable, we introduce evidence-faithful counterfactual verification (EFCV), which rewards selected evidence that remains supportive, compact, and necessary under counterfactual verification. We further introduce SEEK-Bench, featuring video-level episodes with temporal interval annotations, semantic QA and event-chain stage labels. Together, SEEK-VAU and SEEK-Bench establish a strong foundation for evidence-faithful and actively verifiable VAU.

cs.CV