← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.04554 · v1
SEEK-VAU: Towards Evidence-Faithful Video Anomaly Understanding via Agentic Search
首次提交 2026-11-03 17:19
版本更新 2026-11-03 17:19
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
摘要
Most video anomaly understanding (VAU) systems still infer anomaly judgments from evidence collected in a feed-forward way under predefined rules, typically sampled frames, or events clustered from such frames. This protocol fails when the collected evidence is incomplete under imperfect predefined rules, because once reasoning begins the model can no longer search for the missing evidence. We address this limitation with SEEK-VAU, which reframes VAU as an agentic search-and-verify interaction protocol under a bounded search budget: instead of passively reasoning over pre-collected evidence, the policy actively gathers evidence across the three stages of an anomaly event chain (precursor, trigger, and aftermath) and verifies its sufficiency before finalization, turning event-chain completeness into an explicit design rather than an outcome of predefined rules. A bounded budget caps the cost of this search, but does not by itself teach the policy where to look or when to stop. To make this behavior learnable, we introduce evidence-faithful counterfactual verification (EFCV), which rewards selected evidence that remains supportive, compact, and necessary under counterfactual verification. We further introduce SEEK-Bench, featuring video-level episodes with temporal interval annotations, semantic QA and event-chain stage labels. Together, SEEK-VAU and SEEK-Bench establish a strong foundation for evidence-faithful and actively verifiable VAU.
作者备注：Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 (main conference track). 27 pages, 5 figures
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-03 17:19 · 最新观测版本
SEEK-VAU: Towards Evidence-Faithful Video Anomaly Understanding via Agentic Search
Most video anomaly understanding (VAU) systems still infer anomaly judgments from evidence collected in a feed-forward way under predefined rules, typically sampled frames, or events clustered from such frames. This protocol fails when the collected evidence is incomplete under imperfect predefined rules, because once reasoning begins the model can no longer search for the missing evidence. We address this limitation with SEEK-VAU, which reframes VAU as an agentic search-and-verify interaction protocol under a bounded search budget: instead of passively reasoning over pre-collected evidence, the policy actively gathers evidence across the three stages of an anomaly event chain (precursor, trigger, and aftermath) and verifies its sufficiency before finalization, turning event-chain completeness into an explicit design rather than an outcome of predefined rules. A bounded budget caps the cost of this search, but does not by itself teach the policy where to look or when to stop. To make this behavior learnable, we introduce evidence-faithful counterfactual verification (EFCV), which rewards selected evidence that remains supportive, compact, and necessary under counterfactual verification. We further introduce SEEK-Bench, featuring video-level episodes with temporal interval annotations, semantic QA and event-chain stage labels. Together, SEEK-VAU and SEEK-Bench establish a strong foundation for evidence-faithful and actively verifiable VAU.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗