跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 15:43 — 2026-11-04 15:43(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.39758

SEAL: Sealed Queries for Local Sanitization against Indirect Prompt Injection

Doohyun Kim, Donghwa Kang, Mingyu Jun, Brent ByungHoon Kang

Indirect prompt injection threatens local LLM agents through untrusted tool outputs, motivating defenses that suppress attacks while preserving task evidence under limited inference budgets. We introduce SEAL, which learns a soft prompt and scoring readout offline to sanitize tool outputs using a frozen task model. SEAL constructs scoring queries from trusted initial context and the learned prompt, keeping the reference independent of inspected tool text. It scores tokens without normalization across context tokens and uses preservation regularization to encourage retention of useful evidence during localized deletion. This design requires neither defense-generated tokens nor a separate verifier model. Across AgentDojo and AgentDyn, SEAL suppresses attacks while improving task completion under attack. Specifically, on AgentDojo, SEAL reduces attack success from 34.6\% to 0.1\% and increases Joint---task completion without attack success---from 51.4\% to 77.5\%, while using approximately $127\times$ fewer defense-related tokens than PISanitizer, a state-of-the-art prompt injection defense. Replication on a second backbone with the same training recipe supports applicability across model families.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗