跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+3454新增论文
+3159其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+99新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 00:46 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 01:04 — 2026-11-06 01:04(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 00:46最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 00:44(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01473

A Surrogate Model for Variation-Aware Clock-Mesh Analysis and Design-Space Exploration using Graph Neural Networks

Muhammad Hadir Khan, Wajid Ali, Arya Thottiparambil Manikandan, Matthew Guthaus

Clock meshes are widely used in high-performance VLSI systems to minimize skew and tolerate On-Chip Variation (OCV) in nanometer technologies. However, analyzing meshes is difficult because reconvergent paths and multi-source drivers prevent static timing analysis (STA) tools from handling mesh loops, making SPICE the industrial standard. SPICE simulations are accurate but slow, so clock-mesh synthesis relies on approximate models that overlook critical effects such as non-linear buffer driving caused by input slew and input skew. We propose a Graph Neural Network (GNN) based surrogate model of the clock mesh with a new graph representation and a new architecture that predicts power while also improving the delay and slew predictions at the sinks and capturing the skew histogram under OCV. Trained on SPICE data and tested on unseen real designs, our model achieves average errors of $3.40$~ps in delay, $4.14$~ps in slew and $4.46$~ps in skew, compared with $6.28$~ps, $12.35$~ps, and $11.62$~ps for our prior model, and $74.37$~ps delay and $27.51$~ps skew for the approximate method used in current state-of-the-art works. Our model predicts power within $3.4\%$ of SPICE on average, while delivering $18\times$-$1706\times$ speed-ups over the approximate method under OCV modeling, enabling faster and more accurate clock-mesh design-space exploration. A case study on a real design further shows that our surrogate model finds buffering candidates that, at a balanced tradeoff, improves $99^{\text{th}}$-percentile skew by $49.1\%$, reduces power by $25.7\%$, and reduces area by $37.3\%$ at the cost of a $6.8\%$ increase in $99^{\text{th}}$-percentile maximum slew as compared to the state-of-the-art work.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AR · cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗