跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2471新增论文
+2025其中 AI 相关
+163已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-11 06:59 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-10 15:22各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-10 09:27 — 2026-11-11 09:27(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-11 06:59最近发现新增版本:2026-11-10 15:22库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-10 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

20,643 已收录论文17,531 AI 相关5,643 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-11 06:58(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.10174

CXR-CMFA: A Cross-Modal Feature Aggregation Network for Chest X-Ray Pathology Classification

Talukder Hasnat Zadid, Jahin Sultana, Felipe Bochini Brisola, Kishore Roy, Mysha Rahman, Syeda Asrafa Islam, Md. Abdullah-Al-Jubair

原文摘要

Chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation remains challenging because subtle pathology can be obscured by overlapping anatomy, image-quality variation, and limited visual evidence in isolated radiographs. Although image-only deep learning models provide useful baselines, they discard the complementary diagnostic context available in radiology reports, while large vision-language models can be computationally expensive for practical deployment. This paper presents CXR-CMFA, a lightweight cross-modal feature aggregation network for binary CXR pathology classification. The proposed framework combines a dual-stream visual encoder, using EfficientNet-B0 for global anatomical representation and DenseNet-121 for local pathological detail, with a TF-IDF-MLP report encoder. Two fusion modules integrate these modalities: the Dual-Modal Spatial Attention Module (DMSAM) uses the report embedding to gate global and local visual features, and the Cross-Modal Gated Feature Fusion (CGFF) module learns per-instance weights for visual and textual contributions. Experiments on the MIMIC-CXR benchmark, using the provided train, validation, and test splits, show that CXR-CMFA achieves 93.45% accuracy, 99.88% precision, 91.8% recall, 95.7% F1-score, and 99.19% AUC on the held-out test set. The model produces only four false positives among 984 normal test cases, supporting its suitability for high-specificity screening workflows. An ablation study further demonstrates a 22.47 percentage-point AUC improvement over the global-image-only variant, confirming the value of adaptive cross-modal fusion. These results indicate that compact report-conditioned fusion can provide strong discriminative performance without relying on large pretrained language models.

cs.CV · cs.AI