让下一篇重要论文，不再错过。

原文摘要

Languages use different morphosyntactic strategies to express the same meaning. Speakers of multiple languages are able to apply strategies from one language to another, either by mistake or intentionally, to produce a literal translation, or calque. Considering that large language models (LLMs) have been shown to generalize crosslingually, despite being predominantly trained on English, we investigate whether they overgeneralize constructional strategies from English to other languages. To test this, we create a dataset of 5583 sentence pairs across seven languages, matching literal translations of strategies from English into other languages, and literal translations of the other languages' strategies into English. We then quantify constructional bleeding by measuring how often strategies from English are assigned a higher probability than native strategies. We find that models often fail to assign higher probabilities to native strategies and tend to prefer English-derived strategies even when evaluating sentences in other languages. Our findings highlight the limitations of the current English-dominant training paradigm.