跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+2新增论文
+2其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-12 20:30 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-12 06:37各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-11 20:45 — 2026-11-12 20:45(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-12 20:30最近发现新增版本:2026-11-12 06:37库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-11 08:00

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

21,675 已收录论文18,323 AI 相关6,056 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-12 20:24(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2604.06942

Empirical Ciphertext Distinguishability Testing of KEMs and Hybrid Encryption via Deep Learning

Simon Calderon, Niklas Johansson, Onur Günlü

原文摘要

We model indistinguishability under chosen-plaintext attack (IND-CPA) games as binary classification tasks for deep neural networks (DNNs). We apply this methodology to the public-key encryption (PKE) schemes used to construct PQC key encapsulation mechanisms (KEMs) such as ML-KEM and HQC, and to cascaded symmetric algorithms, demonstrating methodological generality. Moreover, we present a novel extension of this approach to empirical distinguishability testing of hybrid KEMs. For IND-CPA-secure schemes and their combinations, no DNN achieves accuracy significantly different from random guessing (measured via Bonferroni-corrected binomial tests), consistent with theoretical security guarantees. For insecure schemes, such as plain RSA, AES-CTR and AES-CBC with IV or counter reuse, or RC4, the DNNs classify the ciphertexts better than random guessing. Thus, this framework is shown to serve as a practical, scheme-agnostic tool for flagging distinguishable ciphertexts in both individual and composed constructions.

cs.CR · cs.IT · cs.LG · cs.NE · eess.SP