跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 07:41 — 2026-11-04 07:41(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.36078

Learning on-the-fly quasi-stationarity diagnostics from low-dimensional surrogates

Noé Blassel

Accelerated dynamics methods, such as parallel replica dynamics, require estimates of the decorrelation time, after which a process trapped in one of its metastable states is distributed according to the quasi-stationary distribution (QSD). In a method proposed by Binder, Lelièvre and Simpson, decorrelation times are defined by coupling a particle approximation of the non-linear conditioned probability flow of the process with MCMC-inspired diagnostics. We explore an alternative to MCMC diagnostics, based on coarse-graining of non-linear probability flows and simulation-based inference. We first develop a coarse-graining framework for killed Markov jump processes conditioned on survival, proving uniform-in-time, non-asymptotic estimates approximating the non-linear probability flow of the true process by the non-linear flow of a surrogate process, defined with a collective variable. The framework does not assume reversibility of the true process, and also gives bounds which scale explicitly in an adiabatic regime. Motivated by these results, we then construct a quasi-stationarity diagnostic using simulation-based inference: a recurrent neural network (RNN), trained on particle approximations of non-linear effective flows, estimates posterior probabilities of decorrelation. The learned diagnostic is then transferred to collective-variable traces of high-dimensional particle approximations. We investigate the behavior and robustness of this diagnostic on a set of numerical experiments, comparing it to the MCMC diagnostic of Binder et al.\ on both synthetic examples and a molecular system, in and out of its training prior distribution. When its prior assumptions hold, the RNN diagnostic outperforms the MCMC diagnostic in ROC analysis, is less conservative, fails less often, and has an interpretable decision threshold.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

stat.ML · cs.LG · math.PR
arXiv ↗PDF ↗