跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1673新增论文
+1257其中 AI 相关
+198已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-13 21:37 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-13 20:44各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-12 22:27 — 2026-11-13 22:27(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-13 21:37最近发现新增版本:2026-11-13 20:44库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-13 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

23,348 已收录论文19,580 AI 相关6,727 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-13 21:33(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.16425

RMIT-ADM+S at TREC RAG 2026: Research Agents, Retriever Ablations, and Open-Weight Replication

Oleg Zendel, Kun Ran, Chenglong Ma, Nguyen Khoi Vo, Shuai Wang

原文摘要

We describe the RMIT-ADM+S team's participation in the TREC 2026 Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) track using the ClimbMix corpus. We submitted seven research-agent runs using proprietary OpenAI and open-weight models, exploring different retrieval strategies, writer models, and agent workflows. Pre-submission ablations identified writer selection and adjacent-chunk expansion as the main factors affecting answer quality. In the official NIST evaluation, six of seven runs exceeded the track median across all three rubric/nugget collections. Our best-performing run, brief-hybrid, achieved the highest all-item coverage among our submissions and tied the track maximum (0.892) for Batch-1 vital coverage. Human side-by-side preferences differed across evaluation batches: the open-weight owa-glm5 led Batch 1 despite lower automated coverage, while sol-research-first led Batch 2. These findings highlight differences between automated coverage measures and human preferences, as well as the potential of lower-cost open-weight models for research-agent systems.

cs.IR · cs.AI · cs.CL