Large language models operationalize an intuitive, view of meaning as use. We argue that it faces a rule-following challenge. Using Kripke's interpretation of Wittgenstein, we argue that finite histories of use do not determine a unique rule for future extension. This reframes the debate about OOD generalization but also about NLP evaluation; benchmarks that measure performance on fixed use cases or local robustness, we argue, do not by themselves establish semantic competence. To evaluate whether models preserve rules and concepts under principled domain extension, we propose to evaluate two capacities, central to this ability: abstraction and recursion; and we offer an experimental paradigm for testing both.
Omar Naim, Swarnadeep Bhar, Jerome Bolte, Nicholas Asher CNRS
原文摘要
While transformer models exhibit strong in-context learning (ICL) abilities, they often fail to generalize under simple distribution shifts. We analyze these failures and identify Softmax, the scoring function in the attention mechanism, as a contributing factor. We propose Scaled Signed Averaging (SSA), a novel attention scoring function that mitigates these failures. SSA significantly improves performance on our ICL tasks and outperforms transformer models with Softmax on several NLP benchmarks and linguistic probing tasks, in both decoder-only and encoder-only architectures.
cs.CL
Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表