跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+788新增论文
+627其中 AI 相关
+81已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-09 11:20 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-09 11:19各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-08 12:48 — 2026-11-09 12:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-09 11:20最近发现新增版本:2026-11-09 11:19库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 21:58

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,888 已收录论文15,288 AI 相关4,419 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-09 11:19(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2610.33877

Semantic Concept Steering Breaks the Explanation Drift Loop in Continual Learning

Yehonatan Elisha, Oren Barkan, Noam Koenigstein

原文摘要

Catastrophic forgetting in continual learning (CL) manifests not only as accuracy degradation but also as \emph{explanation drift}: models maintain predictive accuracy while silently shifting attention from diagnostic features to spurious correlations. This work identifies and resolves a previously overlooked structural flaw in explanation-aware CL: pixel-level saliency regularization derives supervision targets from the model's own frozen saliency maps, creating a \emph{self-referential drift loop} that actively reinforces spurious attention across tasks. We introduce \textbf{C$^3$L} (Concept-Consistent Continual Learning), which breaks this loop by anchoring regularization to class-consistent semantic concepts (e.g., ``curved beak'', ``striped pattern'') discovered offline, independent of model state, providing (i) target independence from model drift, and (ii) cross-instance semantic consistency across every instance of a class. We identify that our concept-based objective, combined with approximate LRP relevance conservation, induces a \emph{crowding-out effect}: since concept and background regions compete for the relevance of the same prediction, enforcing high relevance within concept regions implicitly suppresses spurious background correlations without explicit penalization. \method does not require human-annotated concept sets, as it employs a fully automated concept discovery and spatial grounding. Extensive evaluation across five benchmarks and over 20 baselines demonstrates state-of-the-art performance in accuracy, forgetting, explanation quality, spurious correlation mitigation, and out-of-distribution robustness.

cs.CV