跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1164新增论文
+869其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 04:56 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 05:42 — 2026-11-06 05:42(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 04:56最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 04:54(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.03200

CISA: Retrofitting Dense Attention Models with Chunk-Indexed Sparse Attention

Mohammed Dabbah, Izhak Golan, Oren Tropp, Daniel Afrimi, Vladimir Anisimov, Tomer Asida, Nave Assaf, Ran El-Yaniv 等 13 位作者

Long-context LLM inference is costly because attention repeatedly reads a growing key-value (KV) history. We introduce Chunk-Indexed Sparse Attention (CISA), which retrofits pretrained dense attention models without gradient updates. CISA selects fixed-size KV chunks using compact summaries of existing keys, avoiding token-level indexing and a separate full-length index cache. It uses one indexing query per KV group and shares selected chunks across queries in that group. During prefill, QShare reuses selections across adjacent queries to reduce indexing cost and improve KV reuse and GPU utilization. We evaluate CISA on NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano and Ultra, and Inkling-Small. In one-layer BF16 benchmarks at batch size 32 using Ultra's per-device attention dimensions, core attention is 11.7x faster for prefill queries near the end of a 1M-token prompt and 13.0x faster during decode. Including chunk scoring, selection, and all other measured GPU work, speedups are 8.6x and 3.0x. On Ultra NVFP4 with a 4,096-chunk budget, aggregate scores stay within 1.5 percentage points of dense attention on MRCR, LongBench v2, and GraphWalks. RULER sweeps on Nano and Ultra BF16 up to one million tokens show scores within 2.05 percentage points of dense attention with 8-16x fewer KV reads. Serving million-token prompts with 32 concurrent requests and 4K output tokens per request, CISA achieves 2.29x the end-to-end throughput of dense attention using Nemotron 3 Ultra NVFP4 on four NVIDIA B300 GPUs. Selecting fewer chunks increases throughput to 2.61x; in separate GraphWalks evaluations, the smaller budget widens the aggregate score gap from 1.49 to 3.59 percentage points. These results expose a practical quality-speed tradeoff without sparse training.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG
arXiv ↗PDF ↗