跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+1已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-08 17:39 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-08 06:02各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-07 18:33 — 2026-11-08 18:33(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-08 17:39最近发现新增版本:2026-11-08 06:02库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-06 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

17,100 已收录论文14,661 AI 相关4,057 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-08 17:37(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.36540

Frugal Handwritten Text Recognition for Sub-Saharan Civil-Status Registers: A Smartphone-to-Records Pipeline with CPU-Only Inference

Ousmane Hamadou, Jean Louis Kedieng Ebongue Fendji

原文摘要

Handwritten civil-status registers across Sub-Saharan Africa are being photographed, but rarely transcribed, which leaves their content unsearchable. Local administrations that hold these records typically lack GPUs, reliable connectivity, and the budget for external digitization services. We study whether a frugal pipeline, with consumer-grade capture and CPU-only inference, can make such registers machine-readable. We introduce a corpus of 1,568 smartphone images of handwritten birth, marriage, and death records from a municipal registry in Chad, with line-level transcriptions for 185 records. Our pipeline combines a fully classical preprocessing stage, running at about 2.6 images per second on a laptop CPU, with a Kraken recognizer fine-tuned from a pretrained model in about four hours on a free-tier GPU. On manually corrected line segmentation and a single-registry test set whose writers also appear in training, fine-tuning reduces the character error rate from 14.53% to 0.50% and the word error rate from 56.93% to 3.37%. On a six-core laptop CPU, the recognizer weighs 61 MiB, peaks below 2.6 GiB of RAM, and processes an image in under 6 s on average, excluding line segmentation. Finally, a downstream information-extraction task shows that residual recognition errors cost about 9 F1 points on role resolution, compared with a 36.7-point gap between the fine-tuned and pretrained recognizers. These results are evidence of feasibility within one registry, not of performance on unseen writers or sites; we discuss these limitations in detail.

cs.CV