跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1163新增论文
+868其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 07:02 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 07:51 — 2026-11-06 07:51(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 07:02最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 07:00(北京时间)
新论文 · v1arXiv:2611.01849

FADE: A Flow-Based Approach for Multichannel Tail Estimation

Parmida Valiahdi, Niloofar Mehrnia, Mustafa Furkan Beker, Ubeydullah Erdemir, Ibrahim Hokelek, Sinem Coleri

Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communication (URLLC) is vulnerable to rare low-received-power events, and the spatial-diversity benefits of multiple receivers can be significantly reduced when they experience simultaneous deep fading. Multivariate Extreme Value Theory (MEVT) provides a principled framework for characterizing such joint tail behavior. However, conventional MEVT methods often rely on restrictive parametric assumptions or discrete representations of the dependence structure, which may not fully capture complex multivariate tail behavior. This paper proposes Flow-based Angular Density Estimation (FADE), a flow-based approach for characterizing the dependence between extreme events across receivers within the MEVT framework. FADE transforms multivariate extremes into a standard extreme-value representation and uses a flow-based density estimator to learn the dependence structure from the transformed data without imposing a predefined parametric form. The proposed framework is evaluated using experimentally collected data from a UAV communication system, in which the UAV serves as the transmitter and communicates with two ground receivers. FADE provides closer agreement with the empirical joint CDF, achieving reductions of up to 22.4% in MAE compared with the state-of-the-art Logistic and Maximum Empirical Likelihood (MEL) methods, while also improving distributional agreement and reducing absolute bias.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

eess.SP · cs.AI · eess.SY
arXiv ↗PDF ↗