跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

部分采集异常
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+1164新增论文
+869其中 AI 相关
+88已有论文修订
+100新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:2026-11-06 04:56 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-05 12:13各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-05 05:58 — 2026-11-06 05:58(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:2026-11-06 04:56最近发现新增版本:2026-11-05 12:13库内论文最新更新时间:2026-11-05 02:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

15,949 已收录论文13,765 AI 相关3,571 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。部分信源异常,查看状态 →

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序上轮扫描起点 2026-11-06 04:54(北京时间)
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.32286

Single-or-Sample: Online Fair Allocation for Combinatorial Agents

Shuchi Chawla, Zhiyi Huang, Pooja Kulkarni, Ruta Mehta, Parnian Shahkar

We study the fair allocation of $m$ indivisible goods among $n$ heterogeneous agents arriving online, under maximin share (MMS) fairness. The key challenge lies in making allocation decisions in an adversarial setting without knowing future agents' valuations. No guarantees were known prior to our work in adversarial settings. Our main positive result is an online allocation algorithm for submodular agents that with probability at least $0.4$ guarantees a $1/24$-approximation to MMS to all agents simultaneously. Our algorithm intersperses a greedy-style adaptive sampling-without-replacement protocol with single-good reduction rounds. For XOS valuations, we adapt this single-or-sample approach to guarantee a $c$-MMS for all agents simultaneously with probability $1-O(c)$ for any parameter $c\in O(1/\log n)$. A key technical contribution of our work is in establishing Chernoff-style tail bounds on item allocation events for this adaptive sampling process despite strong positive correlations among the items, a result that may be of independent interest. The approximation versus success probability tradeoffs achieved by our algorithms are asymptotically tight. We show that even for binary additive valuations, no randomized algorithm can ensure $c$-MMS to all agents with probability exceeding $(1-c^2/5)$, for any $c\in (0,1]$. For XOS valuations, stronger lower bounds hold: no randomized algorithm can ensure $c$-MMS to all agents with probability exceeding $(1-c/3)$, for any $c\in (0,1]$. Furthermore, no algorithm can achieve $ω(1/\log \log n)$-MMS with any constant probability. All our lower bounds hold even for simple binary instances whose MMS values and MMS partitions can be computed in linear time.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.GT · cs.DS
arXiv ↗PDF ↗