跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 20:48 — 2026-11-04 20:48(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 1 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
新论文 · v1arXiv:2610.38223

Silhouette-Based Gaitomics for Frailty Assessment in Older Adults

Laura McDaniel, Ryan Roemmich, Crystal Szczesny, Peter Abadir, Rama Chellappa, Basudha Pal

Walking offers a window into physical function that may support interpretable video-based frailty assessment. We developed silhouette-based "gaitomics" to connect frailty predictions with measurable patterns of body configuration and movement. In 66 older adults assessed using the Fried Frailty Phenotype, standardized silhouettes and gait energy images yielded 90 descriptors of shape, temporal variation, motion, and texture. Minimum redundancy maximum relevance selection using the mutual information difference criterion prioritized informative features while limiting redundancy. Each classifier was evaluated using nested stratified cross-validation with five outer and three inner folds at the participant level, with feature ranking and feature-count selection confined to training partitions. Shapley additive explanations examined contributions to held-out predictions. Bilateral silhouette difference led the aggregate feature-selection rankings for three-class classification and both comparisons involving frail participants. Attribution profiles differed across tasks, with texture and consecutive-frame silhouette differences prominent in three-class classification. Among classifier-specific evaluations, CatBoost achieved the highest mean three-class micro-AUC of 0.647 \pm 0.085. Leading pairwise mean micro-AUCs were 0.833 \pm 0.249 for frail versus nonfrail, 0.765 \pm 0.168 for frail versus prefrail, and 0.554 \pm 0.129 for prefrail versus nonfrail classification. These findings connect model predictions to explicit gait characteristics while revealing task-dependent feature priorities and limited separation of prefrail and nonfrail participants. The framework provides an interpretable basis for further investigation, with larger independent studies needed to establish reliability and clinical relevance.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CV
arXiv ↗PDF ↗