跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail

YOUR RESEARCH, IN SIGHT

让下一篇重要论文,不再错过。

覆盖计算机全学科,以 AI 为快捷入口。关注方向、作者和关键词,把发现变成持续的研究积累。

采集已暂停
正在读取账号与研究记录…

全站更新概况

+0新增论文
+0其中 AI 相关
+0已有论文修订
+0新增 AI 导读

arXiv 最近完成扫描:等待完成 · 全站最近入库:2026-11-02 00:39各信源进度 →

统计口径与数据新鲜度

统计 2026-11-03 18:32 — 2026-11-04 18:32(北京时间) · 点击数字查看对应简报;AI 相关包含在新增论文内。

最近完成检查:尚未完成最近发现新增版本:2026-11-02 00:39库内论文最新更新时间:2026-10-30 01:59

每分钟刷新已保存的数据。空检查不代表采集异常;新收录可能包含历史论文。AI 导读按新增版本计数。

8,677 已收录论文7,675 AI 相关1,866 有修订112 HF 社区发现

浏览论文库

时间范围跟随排序:版本更新、本站收录或首次发表。最新收录可能包含历史论文。

找到 3 篇论文 · 按版本更新时间排序等待首次采集
版本更新 · v3arXiv:2609.07655

Online Surrogate Repair: Decoupling High-Fidelity Feedback from Search Length in Closed-Loop Discovery

Xiaotang Feng, Philip Torr, Bruno Andreis

Closed-loop AI scientists can generate candidate designs at low marginal computational cost, whereas reliable feedback may require wet-lab synthesis, characterization, or high-fidelity computation. Addressing this imbalance through custom laboratory automation remains infrastructure-intensive and costly, while replacing new experiments with a fixed surrogate leaves persistent model errors that can be amplified by optimization. We propose \emph{online surrogate repair} (OSR), a closed-loop algorithm that uses sparse high-fidelity evaluations to update the surrogate throughout a longer agent search conducted primarily with inexpensive surrogate feedback. An acquisition rule selects which designs from the agent's accumulated proposals receive high-fidelity evaluation, and the resulting labels update the surrogate used in subsequent episodes. Across controlled synthetic environments, we demonstrate that improving global surrogate fit does not necessarily reduce maximum regret, whereas Q90-UCB and expected improvement (EI) substantially reduce regret by directing evaluations toward regions that determine the optimizer's decisions. \osradded{Across LLM and Chemeleon workflows, Online EI reduces the amount of oracle queries required by 84.3--90.3\% for matching discovery counts and by 77.9--81.6\% for matching the quality of the best material found.} Online surrogate repair introduces a third feedback regime between fixed-surrogate operation and high-fidelity feedback after every episode, separating the frequency of high-fidelity evaluation from the duration of the agent's search.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.LG · cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
版本更新 · v2arXiv:2609.12718

When Rubrics Fail: Hallucinations Reveal Blind Spots in Medical AI Evaluation

Griffin Farrow, Lily Sijia Li, Jack Johnson, Tingyan Wang, Philip Torr, William Bolton, Fabio J. Fehr

Hallucinations can undermine clinician trust in LLMs, making it important that evaluation methods capture clinically relevant errors. Rubric-based evaluation has become the leading approach for assessing LLMs in medicine, but it is unclear whether rubric scores reflect such errors. We first study this in a controlled setting using MedHallu, finding that more specific rubrics better distinguish correct from hallucinated responses. To test this systematically, we develop a taxonomy of medical hallucination types and a clinician-validated error-injection pipeline that creates matched correct and error-injected responses. Across HealthBench, HealthBench Professional, and LiveMedBench, our clinically relevant hallucinations are missed by rubrics, often leaving scores unchanged. We find that rubrics are most effective when explicitly checking facts, and are less effective for additional or unexpected errors they do not anticipate. A preliminary retrieval-based factuality check recovers some of the rubric-blind errors, suggesting a complementary approach. These findings reveal systematic blind spots in current medical evaluation of LLMs and suggest that rubric scores alone are insufficient to establish clinical reliability, potentially undermining clinician trust and confidence in clinical deployment.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.AI
arXiv ↗PDF ↗
首次观测 · 记录 #1ACL Anthology · ACL 2026:acl:2026.acl-long.1444ACL Anthology · ACL 2026

Scaling Behaviors of LLM Reinforcement Learning Post-Training: An Empirical Study in Mathematical Reasoning

Zelin Tan University of Science and Technology of China, Hejia Geng University of Oxford, Xiaohang Yu Imperial College London, Mulei Zhang, Guancheng Wan WanFlow AI and Wuhan University, Yifan Zhou, Qiang He, Xiangyuan Xue The Chinese University of Hong Kong and Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory 等 17 位作者

While scaling laws for large language models (LLMs) during pre-training have been extensively studied, their behavior under reinforcement learning (RL) post-training remains largely unexplored. This paper investigates the scaling behavior of Large Language Model (LLM) reinforcement learning post-training, focusing on mathematical reasoning. Through experiments across the Qwen2.5 series (0.5B to 72B), we characterize how model scale, data, and compute interact. Our analysis yields four key findings: 1. Larger models consistently demonstrate superior compute and data efficiency. 2. The relationship between model performance and training resources follows a predictive power-law across both base and instruction-tuned models. 3. RL learning efficiency exhibits a latent saturation trend with increasing model scale. 4. In data-constrained regimes, performance is primarily driven by the total volume of training data rather than sample uniqueness. These results offer practical guidelines for scaling reasoning capabilities through reinforcement learning post-training.

尚无 AI 解读,展示原文摘要

cs.CL

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · 2026 · 正式发表

ACL Anthology · ACL 2026 ↗PDF ↗